Quote: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development suspended Alan Ayling after he was named as the EDL founder who uses the alias ‘Alan Lake’.
The powerful bank was set up by international treaty to fund development and privatisation schemes in Eastern Europe and Central Asia following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.............................................................................
Its is my firm belief based upon the facts that I was set up as a convenient fall guy for the day after July 22nd in Norway as part of the media frenzy that was knowingly going to ensue. It was all nicely and conveniently tailored to leave me in the frame with the real possibility of arrest and imprisonment under the prevention of terrorism act.
Look at what Breivik did and then he and others pointed the finger of suspicion directly at me as an accomplice and another terrorist cell ready to strike.
Contrary to the media misconception (lie), I was not alleged to be Breivik's inspiration, I was alleged to be his English 'mentor' based upon the facts which are 2 completely different allegations that the media have had a problem differentiating between. The 'mentor' allegation cannot stick because I travelled to Norway to prove the point, so the inspiration label is the next best thing even though it's false and libelous.
Breivik was in London in 2002 supposedly attending a meeting of like minded people after his trip to the Liberian civil war a few weeks before and it was during this meeting in London with a secretive group of people that he says he was assigned his English 'mentor' who he called 'Richard the Lionheart' inside his manifesto. These trips to Liberia and London are both facts.
Is Breivik lying about his story behind the meaning concerning these facts, and there is absolutely no meaning behind both these trips and he met no one and talked to no one on his suspicious international travels? Or is he telling the truth about meeting like minded people in Liberia and in London which was his recruitment process into a secretive extreme right-wing group?
I go with him telling the truth because to believe he met no one and and talked to no one in Liberia and London is unbelievable to anyone and not humanly possible, so the question is who did he meet and what was discussed? Was it exactly as he says it was? Maybe tweaked a little later on for maximum impact and effect.
Video: The folly of Alan Lake
It is the facts concerning London along with 'Richard the Lionheart' and a few more pointers that placed me in the frame as being his English 'mentor' and not the media lie of being his inspiration.
At the very beginning, literally 1 or 2 days into me being placed in the frame I was willing to accept that I could have been his inspiration because of what the media were stating and my whole world at that point being turned upside down with me trying to make sense of it all after being implicated with a man who had just murder 69 innocent kids on their summer camp and blown up his government building killing 8 people inside. When I sat back and looked at the facts though I saw that I was not alleged to be his inspiration where there has to be no factual links to smear someone you just need to make it look convincing and believable in the media based upon perceptions and not facts. I was actually alleged to be his English 'mentor' based most importantly upon the 2002 London meeting, the name 'Richard the Lionheart' and other things Breivik stated within the manifesto that conveniently pointed suspicion in my direction. This made me sit back and look at the picture to see what was really going on and the only thing that made sense to me was that Breivik or whoever had helped write the manifesto had set me up to be a fall guy for after his atrocities because his actions towards me were hostile in nature.
Not knowing Breivik or ever having any contact with him made me wonder why he would want to set me up and for what reason?
The only assumption I had was that Alan Lake & Co were behind Breivik because he/they had reason to set me up, they are ideologically intertwined, both linked through their expression of the anti-jihad movement (EDL & SIO) which brings in Fraudman who the manifesto is named after and who is part of the real inspiration behind Breivik. Lake & Co had motive and real reason to attack me with the hope of removing me from being a threat to their continued political agenda (because it was only a matter of time), or at the very least destroy my reputation by always being linked through the media to a mass murdering monster who murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp. Its Fraudman who cannot escape that direct link now though because the blood soaked manifesto is named after his own work although his supporters are all in denial about how linked Fraudman is. I personally am not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere yet stood accused.
After Lake's police interrogation he gave an interview to Dagbladet where he encouraged people to read Fraudman's work just like Breivik did through his terrorist acts, and stated that Breivik was 'special'.
What does the psychology of that say?
I don't know all of the pointers placed within the manifesto that directed everyone in my direction, but one of the main ones was Malta which was laughable at how obvious it was when I was sitting there the moment the manifesto was given to the world after Breivik's atrocities, and another was 'Richard the Lionheart' the name he gave his English 'mentor' although I have never ever used that name.
For Breivik the self proclaimed atheist Knights Templar who revels in his self perceived historical and social intellect after supposedly writing his 1500 page manifesto to state that Malta was a base for his Knights Templar Order and not even mention one of the greatest Christian military Order's victories over the Ottoman Empire in 1565 which is more commonly known as the "Great Siege of 1565" shows a blatant flaw in his understanding of Malta which makes me wonder whether he ever really travelled to Malta or wrote the pointers inside the manifesto directing towards me, because how could anyone call themselves a Knight and talk of Malta in Holy War terms and not mention the Great siege of 1565?
Impossible. So who wrote Malta into the manifesto?
Because the media attention was conveniently set up to be directed my way the day after the attacks it deflected any real attention from anyone else in the immediate aftermath other than the EDL because of Breiviks boasts about them inside the manifesto. The EDL director Alan Lake and EDL leader "Tommy" immediately pointed the finger at me across their UK media platform which then set the stage for the media story that was then spread around the World that whoever was behind the whole scenario knew was going to happen. This is why I was conveniently and suspiciously placed in the frame to take the flack at the very beginning, thus the fall guy which suited Alan Lake & Co.
The media story is then very hard to change at a later date because how can the papers go back on their libelous claims and leave themselves open for a libel case based upon their own words? Of course they couldn't they would prefer for the mud to stick because it is not sticking on them or their personal lives so what do they care? That's why there has been no real media coverage about Alan Lake & Co and his links to the Breivik enquiry other than in the Sunday Times and the Guardian, because how would it look if they were used by Lake & Co and crucified an innocent mans reputation? There has pretty much been complete silence about Lake being interviewed by the Norwegian police concerning his possible involvement along with his little cabal who are all connected to him and the EDL, and this includes questioning who this real life 'Richard the Lionheart' is who Alan Lake's little cabal refrained from mentioning to anyone the days after Breivik struck leaving me to take all the blame.
The director behind the EDL leadership interviewed about his possible involvement with the Norwegian mass murdering extreme right-wing political terrorist Anders Breivik and the British media have pretty much stayed silent?
Suspicious? Who is behind Lake protecting him?
At the very beginning I stated that I believed it was Alan Lake behind Breivik and all circumstantial evidence and individuals actions now prove that claim to be right. The most important piece of evidence is the fact that he has a friend who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' when he posts online who he invited to attend a strategy and discussion meeting at his London flat in 2009 concerning the anti-Islamisation street protest movement. As far as anyone is aware at this moment in time nobody (Norwegian/British Police) have traced or interviewed this person and the media are not asking the question about who he is either which would send shockwaves and open up the whole case in the media.
The only ones who have questioned this in the media is Dagbladet and the Norwegian police have confirmed the existence of this 'Richard the Lionheart'.
So why has he not been traced and interviewed yet? 6 months after Breivik's terrorist attacks.
Who invited this person to sit in on the pre-founding EDL meeting in Lakes London flat along with the other person present Kinana who is said to be a Catholic priest which would fit in ideologically with a secretive group involved in extreme right-wing politics and professing to be a Knights Templar Order.
Why was this 'Richard the Lionheart' shown the importance to have been invited to that first meeting by Alan Lake that was set up by the leader of the British wing of CVF Ann/Gaia, and is this the man Breivik talks of, who he said he sent ideological material to at the start of the EDL?
I was involved with the anti-Jihad street protest movements that were on the scene before the EDL and I was involved with Luton's UPL before the EDL was born. After the UPL protest in Luton and then several smaller outings that culminated in Birmingham on July 4th 2009 I turned to Ann/Gaia of CVF about bringing the street protest movement that was small at that time together with the ideological political side to transform it into a National movement as that was the vision I had that was spelled out on the very first ever EDL interview after the Birmingham demo. Ann/Gaia agreed and turned to Alan Lake who I did not know at that time and set the meeting in place at his London flat in the Barbican. It was at this meeting that I first met Alan Ayling who called himself Alan Lake, and his friends Kinana and 'Richard the Lionheart' to discuss a way forward with the street protest movement.
Who invited Kinana and 'Richard the Lionheart' to this meeting? Was it Alan Lake or was it Ann/Gaia of CVF? And why were they invited to that meeting? What was the reasoning behind them being there?
Why when I turned to Ann/Gaia about setting up a National anti-Islamisation street protest movement did she turn to Alan Lake? What was her reasoning behind turning to Alan Lake?
Several weeks later the founding EDL meeting took place at the same location where Steven Yaxley-Lennon aka "Tommy" assumed the leadership position of the EDL movement at my behest. There were others present at this second meeting which included amongst others, the military tactician Gandalf of the Up Pompeii blog who if you were going to commit such terrorist acts in the name of extreme right-wing politics like Breivik's as part of a wider terrorist campaign, would be an ideal candidate for putting together a 'strategy' for the campaign which would include setting me up as a fall guy to take the blame, thus defelecting blame and suspicion from anyone else. This is the same reason why he was invited to the founding EDL meeting where he discussed Roman military formations as a 'strategy' for the street protest movement.
Who invited Gandalf to this founding EDL meeting? Was it Alan Lake, Kinana, Ann/Gaia, or Chris Knowles who were all present?
Who is this Gandalf and what is his background and who is he connected to?
Several weeks after this meeting I received news from Dymphna at Gates of Vienna informing me that Alan Lake had been telling everyone that they had to get rid of me from the EDL leadership. This suited several founder leaders like Chris Renton who I already had issues with and eventually created the hijacking of the original leadership structure where they removed the Christian spiritual influence over the movement who brought all the Templar iconography an ideology to the original EDL and put the vision for the movement in place and replaced it with an American Jewish Rabbi (work that one out)? Lake did this because after the founding meeting he knew my influence was a threat to his personal ambitions and agenda using the street protest movement because he wanted complete control over the movement for his own reasons (agenda) and unlike "Tommy" I could not be bought with money or vanity. Regardless of anything if I do not believe something is right I will stand by my belief and convictions and defend them with anyone which placed Alan Lake in a position he did not want to be in which was one where he could not dictate or control the movement whilst I still had influence over the leadership.
I was a threat to his ambitions (agenda) so in his mind I had to go and because I was not in the Country to defend myself due to my involvement in getting the EDL off of the ground in the first place, one thing led to another and Alan Lake achieved his goal of removing me from any involvement with the EDL. This reached a head after his Newcastle speech and resulted in a public confrontation with myself and Nick+. He did not remove me completely from the picture though and then the bigger picture became clear to me about the Luton EDL leadership (explained later) and their mish-mash of blind anti-jihad supporters and endorsers. Because of this and other things I targeted the leadership of the EDL and exposed them for the IRA supporters/family members, frauds that they are and cowards who target women and English grandmothers, whilst using and abusing what was a righteous patriotic movement. They were endorsed by the likes of Lake & Co (Fraudman, Pamella Geller) whilst using the EDL membership as a bunch of useful idiots, all being used for different reasons by the leadership whilst running around the Country under the English banner and the call of anti-Islamisation. This threat to Alan Lake & Co's future political agenda, their reputations which includes that of their political endorsers who they are linked with and after 2 years hard work, along with all the money they had invested whilst using the EDL movement and their puppets "Tommy" & Uncle Kev is in my belief why their 'special' friend Breivik targeted me as part of his/their terrorist attack against the Norwegian Government and people. Breivik boasts about all of his EDL friends after all and I definitely was not one of them.
After the founding EDL meeting I emailed Ann/Gaia about Alan Lake because I knew there was something wrong about him, I could just sense that he was not on the same wavelength and that he was coming to the table with a different agenda, his own agenda. My view was that he wanted to be another Geert Wilders. He was coming to things from a different angle from everyone else present, an angle that was not pure and I could see that. I asked how she knew him and she said she doesnt really know him and that he had started to attend their CVF lunches but was held at arms length so there was obviously other people with concerns about him. I then pointed out how easy it would be for someone like Lake to inflitrate the movement for his own purposes if nobody knows anything about him or where he was coming from. It looks like my perception was completely right.
Email 1 - Email 2
What was Ann/Gaia's reasoning behind going to Alan Lake about setting up the National anti-Islamisation street protest movement in the first place?
How did Alan Lake end up attending CVF lunches? Who vouched for him or invited him, and why?
What was Alan Lake's background for him to want to get involved with the anti-Jihad movement?
I have my own reasons so what are Alan Lake's reasons?
Where did he come from and who is he linked to pre the EDL? Is he a part of a secretive extreme right-wing neo-Gladio style group who infiltrated the anti-Jihad movement to further their political ideals that has ended in Breivik?
Considering Alan Lake has potentially used CVF and the SIO groups for his own agenda and damaged everyones hard work within the anti-Jihad movement by possibly being linked to Breivik whilst working under the cover of their organisations, America's Frank Gaffney and Chrstine Brim should be getting to the bottom of these questions from their UK and European leaders so they know exactly who Alan Lake is, how he inflitrated their groups and how deeply is he entrenched within them. Unless of course they support him which I do not personally believe because at the core I believe the top tier of these organisations are on the right page and would never support or endorse someone like Breivik or anyone else committing such acts in the name of their groups or under the cover of their groups, but you never know and Lake is in the middle of them all.
Ann/Gaia has already blatantly lied to the Sunday Times journalist about her involvement in this whole affair so she obviously has something to hide because people only lie when they want to hide from the truth. The question is; did she know about Breivik via Lake before July 22nd 2011 which means she could quite possibly be complicit in the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century?
She kept completely silent at the very beginning when she knew there was a 'Richard the Lionheart' directly linked to Alan Lake and allowed me to take the blame for being this person.
Breivik is said to have attended the EDL demo in support of Geert Wilders in London when he was inside the "House of Lords" showcasing his film Fitna to those on the guest list. As far as I am aware Paul Weston was on that guest list and in attendence of the screening of Fitna that day. Paul Weston is a part of Lake & Co and has been an ardent EDL leadership supporter and ideological endorser online since the EDL's birth.
Whilst Paul Weston and everyone else were inside the "House of Lords" that day and the EDL were outside, the EDL was being led on the day by Alan Lake and "Tommy" with Fraudman and Ned May of Gates of Vienna present along with Breivik if he too was there.
Paul Weston has taken over the BFP which is an offshoot of the BNP started by expelled BNP members. He has now taken on the leader of the EDL "Tommy" and given him a place on the Executive committee of the BFP. It was Ann/Gaia who helped facilitate this merger as she is a friend of Paul Weston and has had a controlling hand on the EDL via Lake since its birth in Lakes London flat in 2009. She covered the story of the merger for the BFP site after the meeting in Birmingham.
This scenario in London involving the "House of Lords" shows the level and the type of people connected to each other and gives an insight into why certain individuals have been protected from the Breivik enquiry and why there has been no real media coverage of Lake & Co's involvement with the EDL or the Norwegian mass murder enquiry. Imagine how damaging it would be if Alan Lake was involved with Breivik and he is directly connected to other people not yet known who were also in attendence within the "House of Lords" that day?
All the likely suspects in the same place on the same day.
This new revelatory information covered by the Sunday Times concerning Ann/Gaia gives you another example of the level of people this cabal of Lake & Co are connected to: Companion of Honour linked to Breivik enquiry
Someone must have thought a peasent like me was an easy target to set up as a fall guy for Breivik.
Was me knowing what I know and being a threat to their political agenda using a couple of drug dealing IRA supporters from Luton more added motivation for someone to want rid of me considering I was going no where until my issue with this cabal behind the EDL leadership and the leadership of "Tommy" & Uncle Kev was finished?
The question is; whose names and faces are now on the intelligence whiteboard of being directly linked to this cabal surrounding Alan Lake & Co?
You can only wonder what has been going on behind the scenes in the upper levels of society concerning this group and their influence over the security apparatus of the Country and the British side of the Breivik enquiry and the misdemenours of the EDL leadership!
Further reading: Alan Lakes threats to murder me
Thankfully not everyone thinks the same on that level of society so there are others who think differently about this case and peoples involvement who I am sure are working to get to the bottom of this because either Alan Lake & Co are behind Anders Breivik or they are not and there is enough evidence for a full and thorough investigation.
At the beginning stages of the aftermath of the terrorist attacks it emerged that several Norwegian politicians had been recorded at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference talking about blowing up the government building and assassinating government figures which is exactly what Breivik ended up doing.
Stop the Islamisation of Norway can be linked to Alan Lake & Co, Fraudman and Breivik.
Who are Alan Lake's friends in the Norwegian government and how did he make these friends along with his friends in the Swedish government?
Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake was also director of a financial company linked to Norway and Breivik himself was involved with financial companies in different Countries?
The whole thing with Breivik was tailored by people involved with the European anti-Jihad movement and if it is traced back to Alan Lake as I believe it will be with him already being involved in Swedish politics and having his eyes on the Scandinavian Countries for some reason (not publicly known yet) as is shown through his interview that was aired on Norwegian TV pre-Breivik's attacks, then you will see why pointers were placed inside the manifesto to direct attention my way at the beginning hoping that it would completely destroy me, thus removing the threat to Alan Lake & Co and their control over the EDL and all of its European off-shoots and their future political agenda in the anti-Jihad movement.
As the old saying goes "killing two birds with one stone".
Breivik is not a 'lone wolf' who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed whilst sitting in the confines of his bedroom playing computer games over 10 years while his mother was cooking and cleaning for him downstairs with nobody knowing anything about him. For the media and public figures to still be spinning that 'lone wolf' line after knowing the facts about Liberia and London, and we dont know the truth behind Belarus yet, points to a cover up (white wash) of the whole truth behind Breivik.
Then you have to question by who and why?
Isnt it about time the bigger picture and suspicion of other peoples involvement is brought out into the public domain and serious questions asked.
You can never commit a perfect crime and for some reason Breivik has left a large trail of information and evidence behind him, but he doesnt care now because he is sitting in prison under the strictest security so nobody can get to him and has now gone way beyond the level of those who helped place him in prison and is waiting to start dictating to his new followers from the safety and security of his prison cell. Look at Hitler who called for a Revolution, ended up in prison and then finished up leading Nazi Germany, staring World War II and committing the Holocaust.
As Alan Lake himself stated to Dagbladet "He is special".
Maybe Breivik has his own reasons that are different from those who helped place him in prison, and he is not the gullible 'useful idiot' they believed him to be whilst they were brainwashing him with the perfect Knight idea (just a thought). He has excelled all of them and now sits isolated from the world outside under State protection and has the ultimate power (knowledge) over those who helped placed him in there, and for some reason has given the Norwegian police alot of evidence to work through and understand. He is now the leader of their European group. He was not killed during his terrorist attacks and now has his hand on the whole picture concerning him and his friends and holds the ultimate power over each of them especially his London link who is the most important one to Breivik as this is where his attacks eminate from with the manifesto and everything else in British English including his Anglacised name obviously for the UK extreme right-wing market place for phase 2.
The most prominent right-wing group in the UK is the EDL and Alan Lake is/was the director behind the leadership?
Who knows Breiviks mind, his reasons and motives but he himself and those now seeking to understand him and what he has done.
He is not just a mass murderer who killed a bunch of innocent kids to feed a natural born psychopathic blood lust, he is the leader of an extreme right-wing political movement dressed up in the clothes of Templarism with him now calling himself the Grandmaster of the Order who targetted the Left-wing in his Country with a 1500 page manifesto explaining his reasoning and justification.
If Breivik does have people on the outside who he was involved with to carry on the work which he does based upon the facts, along with his new followers recruited online via the manifesto and media coverage then for him to claim that title might sound like madness to those who cannot see the truth through the lies, but fits into context with the 'strategy' although he could never be a Templar let alone a Grandmaster because he is not a Christian but in today's anti-Islamisation climate it was the best thing (strategy) to dress up his agenda in just like the hijacked EDL - Wolves in sheeps clothing
Dressing up his acts as a neo-Nazi was never going to get mainstream right-wing support throughout Europe and beyond that those who are behind the strategy knew, so they took on Templarism as the public image and in the process with not knowing the true heart of Templarism which is a firm foundation of belief and faith in Jesus Christ have damaged the identity of true Templarism that dates back almost 1000 years to the Crusades because no Templar would support or condone Breivik's extreme right-wing political acts against 69 innocent left-wing children on their summer camp which also includes all those left scared from the events that day.
Templarism is against Islamic fundamentalism which is holy war and not a godless left v right-wing political war.
John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.