25 February 2012

Investigating the Belarus training camps

Website: Belarusian Telegraph Agency

Belarus asked to help investigate Breivik’s case

24.02.2012 17:05

MINSK, 24 February (BelTA) – The Prosecutor-General's Office of Belarus has received a request from Norway to provide legal assistance on Anders Breivik’s case, BelTA learnt from the Prosecutor-General's Office.

Upon a petition of the Prosecutor General of the Kingdom of Norway, Oslo prosecutors submitted a request to the Prosecutor-General's Office of Belarus to provide legal assistance in investigating a criminal case of Anders Breivik who committed a double terror act in Norway on 22 July 2011.

Norway would like to get details of the trip of Anders Breivik to Belarus in 2005, his contacts and places he visited. The Prosecutor-General's Office forwarded the request to the State Security Committee of Belarus to establish cooperation with the law enforcement agencies of Norway and provide the legal assistance in investigating Anders Breivik’s case.

“The work of Belarusian law enforcement agencies, including high professionalism and efficiency demonstrated during the investigation of the Minsk metro blast were acknowledged by foreign states and their law enforcement agencies,” the Prosecutor-General's Office informed.

24 February 2012

The perculiar case of Qatada and Tappin

The British Government wants to sort its priorities out!

Why has Abu Hamza not been extradited to America yet for setting up terrorist training camps there? Instead him and his family sit back comfortably protected by their army of human rights lawyers funded by the British tax payer while fighting extradition. Also living off of the tax payer in their £800,000 London home and funding their family clan with benefits from the Social Security system.

You wonder why there is a 'revolt' coming...

Osama Bin Laden's ambassador to Europe Abu Qatada cannot even be deported back to Jordan, yet we ship off hereditary UK citizens at the drop of the hat because they do not have an army of human rights lawyers playing the legal Democratic system against itself as part of the jihad.

Has the UK already been taken over from within?

Further reading: Theresa May - Hero or Villain?

Daily Mail

  • 65-year-old denies trying to sell batteries for missiles destined for Tehran
  • 'I could be 100 before I get out... I'll never see my own home country again'
  • 'If I was a terrorist I would not be going to America. It's a disgrace'
  • Golf club president will be held in notorious Texan jail crammed with gangs
  • Case echoes the plight of 46-year-old Asperger's sufferer Gary McKinnon

  • Retired British businessman Christopher Tappin was today flying to a notorious jail in Texas to await trial after losing his two-year battle against extradition.

    Mr Tappin, who is accused of conspiring to sell components for Iranian missiles, met marshals at Heathrow police station before being flown to the U.S. where he could face 35 years in jail.

    Mr Tappin, 65, said this morning that he had fewer rights than the extremist hate preacher Abu Qatada who has been allowed to stay in the UK. Qatada was once described by a judge as Osama Bin Laden's right hand man in Europe.

    Touching a walking stick with his weeping wife Elaine at his side, Mr Tappin said today that his treatment had been a 'disgrace'.

    Moments later he was ushered onto a waiting jet where he was handcuffed. He will land at 4pm and spend the evening in a notorious deep south prison 'run by gangs' as he awaits trial.

    Continue reading: Tappin extradited

    22 February 2012

    Breivik - "A Question of Doubt"

    The Norwegian police prosecutors have stated from the very beginning that Breivik acted alone in the totality of his actions from start to finish which dates back to 2002 and his trips to the Liberian civil war and then the alleged London meeting, meaning there are no accomplices, thus no network, meaning Breivik is a 'lone wolf' who committed his terrorist acts which includes compiling a 1500 page manifesto, all alone.

    They have consistently said that as each day passes they are more certain that Breivik acted alone and there is no network.

    For some reason the Norwegian police prosecutors have completely closed the door firmly shut to other possibilities surrounding Breivik meaning they will not deviate from their long standing official line of Breivik the 'lone wolf' nut who is officially certified as insane.

    Although the certified label has not legally stuck which is why there is now another report being prepared with the justice system in Norway attempting to defend the integrity of its judicial process by saying Breivik can be insane and sane at the same time - Work that one out?

    There is overwhelming compelling circumstantial evidence and other evidence to state the contrary to the official 'lone wolf' line, so how are the Norwegian police prosecutors ever going to be able to turn around and change the official line that has been propagated through the worlds media for the past 7 months and say that Breivik did not act alone and that there are accomplices out there meaning a network/group is involved with him?

    Their whole integrity and reputation is on the line.

    They state that as each day passes they are more certain Breivik acted alone which leads me to personally believe that there is an official 'white wash' of the whole case for some reason.
    In my opinion I would say that as each day passes and more information is released through the media it looks more like there are others working with Breivik, or at the very least there is enough suspicious activity to warrant leaving the door open to the possibility of others working with him until 'over the course of time' completely and satisfactorily discounted or proven. This would mean rather than saying he is a 'lone wolf' who acted alone and as each day passes we are more certain of this fact, it should be "we are uncertain whether or not Breivik acted alone" which leaves the door open to any other possibility and other peoples involvement.

    We are keeping an 'open mind' is usually the statement used.

    Instead Norwegian politicians travel the world telling everyone Breivik is a 'lone wolf' nut who acted completely alone, without the investigation reaching its natural and final conclusion after searching out all avenues of enquiry, thus continually propagating the unfounded official line on government level.

    If it is a Norwegian Government 'white wash' for political reasons then in my personal opinion it will bring down the government because it would be an affront to every ethnic Norwegian on all sides of the political spectrum that their ruling government who Breivik specifically targeted due to their conduct against the Norwegian people would then use such a horrific National tragedy that has effected all corners of Norwegian society for cheap political gains at the complete detriment of those murdered and maimed by Breivik on July 22nd.

    Closing the Breivik enquiry down, and officially claiming he is a 'lone wolf' who is certified as insane (that nobody believes), without leaving the enquiry open for other possibilities, is in my opinion, an attempted Norwegian government white wash of the whole event - That's my conclusion

    If Breivik is a 'lone wolf' in the totality of his actions then there is another explanation to my own, as to how I ended up in the middle of the enquiry as the man behind the monster that butchered and murdered 69 kids on their summer camp in Norway whilst dressed as a policeman as an act of political rage against his government, but I cannot see any other explanation and there is always an explanation. So either the Norwegian police are no better than some third world village police force or they are being closed down from above.

    Take your pick!

    2 questions for now; Who is Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'? And was Breivik trained in Belarus?

    Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is a key to open up something in relation to the whole enquiry, and confirmation of the training camps in Belarus would prove beyond doubt that Breivik is not a 'lone wolf' as has been consistently stated in the media, which would then beg the question as to why and for what reason have the Norwegian police attempted to close down the case in the public eye with the official 'lone wolf' lie?

    Even going so far as stating as each day passes we are more certain he acted alone...

    The Norwegian anti-Islamisation immigration movement

    TV2: Democrat MP's recorded discussing blowing up Government building

    Now the world knows Anders Breivik we also know his claims and one of them is that he is the leader of the Norwegian resistance movement against Islamisation and immigration that comes under the political banner of multi-culturalism.

    He is an extreme right-wing political terrorist basing his actions and view point upon domestic and European politics and not a religious terrorist basing his actions upon Holy War and that view point.

    Yet Breivik wrapped up his extreme right-wing political acts in Templarism, where true Christianity, based upon a firm belief in Jesus Christ and His sacrifice for mankind is the cornerstone. Without that nobody could ever call themselves a Templar, and to attempt to call yourself a Templar based upon 700 years of history without the true foundation makes a wolf in sheep’s (spiritual) clothing attempting to find common ground where there is none.

    Extreme right-wing Neo-Nazism is old news and unacceptable to the mainstream majority so the extreme right-wing Nazi’s want to dress up in new clothes so as to be acceptable in today’s 21st Century geo-political climate and have stolen the clothes of the 'Defenders of the faith' and butchered and maimed a bunch of innocent kids in them.

    Breivik’s Norwegian anti-Islamisation immigration movement is a political movement with political players. To say that Breivik is a ‘lone wolf’ and not a part of a larger movement in Norway is ridiculous when there were 2 Democrat MP’s recorded at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference talking about blowing up the Government building and assassinating members of their own Government. They were both subsequently arrested but I have no more information about it.

    Breivik committed the exact same acts that they spoke several months before July 22nd 2011.

    Is there are suspicious parallel to be drawn?

    Does Anders Breivik have support in Norway? Is Anders Breivik a part of a wider Norwegian movement? Or is he a ‘lone wolf’ nut as the official line states, who knows nobody within the anti-Islamisation immigration movement in Norway and nobody supports him?

    Those 2 Norwegian Democrat MP’s must support him if nobody else!

    Breivik’s “2083” manifesto was named after one of his fellow Norwegian comrades (Fraudman) essays.

    All these Norwegians with the exact same views of Norwegian society and what to do about it which reaches from inside the government level extreme right-wing political scene down now into several murder scenes, one of them being the scene of a mass murder of innocent kids on their summer camp.

    Can anyone else see a larger common theme here in Norway or is it only me?

    Fraudman made a comment about me to an Aftenposten journalist where he called me “a dog that barks but does not bite.” In the scheme of things, massacring a bunch of innocent left wing kids on their summer camp whilst dressed as a policeman is definitely not my style of biting which differentiates us morally.

    Why did Fraudman say this when we were both in the middle of the larger enquiry? Either he is directly involved and was gloating to the journalist as if to undermine me in some warped way, or he was reveling in his new found self perceived authority of being directly linked to a mass murdering Norwegian political terrorist who had just butchered and murdered a load of innocent Norwegian kids on Utoya island and named his actions after one of his own essays.

    Ill let others decide on that one.

    Either way what he quoted was definitely not befitting someone who wants absolutely no association with Breivik and his atrocities, and put with other information makes him look completely guilty of some level of involvement.

    Hiding computers when the police are about to come knocking on your door comes to mind (guilty conscience).

    Fraudman is linked to the SIO movement, he is directly linked to Alan Lake, he is directly linked to the SION group and the Democrat MP’s talking about conducting a coup against their elected government and he is directly linked to Breivik himself. They even had direct email contact, probably (in my opinion) before actually meeting in person somewhere on the political anti-jihad scene in Norway.

    The 2 Norwegian Democrat MP’s recorded talking about a government coup obviously have close links to Alan Lake because they spoke about meeting the leader of the EDL. That would have only been facilitated by the Director behind the EDL and also the wider ‘group’ behind the EDL (CLA) who help form and organise the SIO groups throughout Europe because IRA “Tommy” is their puppet.

    Alan Lake has stated that he has contacts within the political scene in Norway so it’s pretty obvious it is these ones talking about a government coup at the SION conference pictured above.

    This information gives a little glimpse into the background of the anti-Islamisation immigration movement in Norway that Breivik professes to belong to, and of which, on whose behalf he acted, making him the leader of the armed side of the movement to which they all belong, either linked directly which is most probable, but certainly ideologically. The manifesto was named after Fraudman's work after all.

    When Breivik was arrested on Utoya island he told the police it was a coup de tat.

    There can be no doubt that there are others out there in Norwegian society who think like Breivik, but the question is; was Breivik completely alone in Norway and committed his actions with no one knowing anything about anything or was he a part of a network/group? A group linked to players further afield than Norway itself who have their own political agendas.

    All traced back to Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake the suspected English 'mentor'.

    The call to the ministry

    Dagbladet: Breivik did not make the call to the ministry

    There was a call to the ministry in Norway said to be sometime in March 2011 where someone is said to have talked about targeting the AUFere’s and a manifesto. The person who took the call is said to have taken the information to her Supervisor but no further action was taken at that time.

    So if this information is true, there is a ministry employee and her Supervisor who both agree that this call and the information contained within this call took place sometime in or around March 2011.

    The Norwegian police have said that they cannot find information in the records to say that this call took place. Probably not by Breivik himself, thus they cannot find a direct link to him so they attempt to deny the call ever took place. They rule out the possibility that it could have been made by someone else because Breivik is meant to be a ‘lone wolf’ and to say otherwise obviously has serious implications for people.

    I should imagine there are a few obscure numbers on the list that do not equate which leaves enough proof that the call was made on the back of the witness statements. I wonder if there are any public phone box numbers on the list.

    If you state a government endorsed official line (lone wolf) and rule out any other possibility before you investigate properly, then any future discrepancies in the enquiry that shed a completely different light on the whole case have to be denied or ruled out because they go against the government endorsed official line which calls everything into question, even the integrity of the investigation itself and those carrying it out.

    Just because the Norwegian police cannot find the call log from Breivik himself does not mean that the call did not take place by someone else. There is supposed to be 2 witnesses who both agree that a call was made, and detail the information contained in that call that corroborates with Breivik’s actions on July 22nd 2011.

    When Breivik was first asked about this call he said he made the call but could not remember what he said.

    I straight away thought, well he must be psychotic then if he cannot remember making a call of such significance, where he is said to have talked about his impending attack and the manifesto.

    But I don’t think he is psychotic so there had to be another reason for his critical large scale memory loss.

    My thoughts instinctively were that someone else must have made the call and when put ‘on the spot’ by the Norwegian police Breivik knowing someone else must have made the call, covered for them with a lie, stating he made the call but could not remember what he said to cover his/their tracks.

    He really didn’t know what was said because he did not make the call.

    This was confirmed at a later date when he was questioned over the call again. He then denied making that exact call detailing the impending attack and the manifesto.

    Breivik himself was admitting someone else must have made that specific call if it did take place.

    What he said to the Norwegian police was that he was in the middle of making his bomb and preparing for the coming attacks and was trying to cut out all possibilities of detection and capture before the final attack stage, so making the call detailing his future plans possibly causing detection and arrest was definitely not going to be on his agenda at that point in time, so it definitely was not him who made it.

    Under such a heightened state of alert and fearing capture before successfully achieving the goal, ringing the ministry talking flippantly about his plans himself would definitely not be something he would be doing unless he was psychotic.

    Did someone else make that call? Or was it Breivik himself?

    If the call was definitely made (2 witnesses say it was) and it was not Breivik himself then it is a 100% certainty there are others in Norway who had prior knowledge of the attacks which includes most importantly the “2083”manifesto. This means Breivik is part of a wider network/group in Norway with the attack being an inspired high impact attack and not a 'lone wolf' attack. This fits in-line with his claims about being a part of a Norwegian resistance movement and fits in-line with the ideological scene and players out there that he is directly linked to in Norway and further afield.

    What is the truth behind the telephone call?

    2 witnesses within the ministry say that the call took place prior to July 22nd and detail the information contained within the call because it was of such a ‘nature’ (threats) that it had to be passed to a Supervisor to determine what action if any should be taken.

    For the Norwegian police to say or insinuate the call never took place, substantiates their 7 month long government endorsed official claim of Breivik being a ‘lone wolf’ which is why they state they cannot find any evidence that the call took place.

    Neither officially confirmed or denied – A question of doubt

    Suspicious men at Breivik's bomb making farm/factory

    Dagbladet: Mystery men visiting Breivik's bomb making farm/factory

    Its safe to say that judging by the close proximity between Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory and the adjacent farms nearby as can be seen in the picture above, he did not test detonate any bombs there to hone his bomb making skills ready for July 22nd.

    So unless Breivik was some type of freak of nature and was able to create his massive bomb that was able to destroy a large part of his Government building on his first attempt of ever detonating a bomb in his life with it being based upon a ‘lone wolf’ internet recipe downloaded from the net, then he must have had outside help and training.


    We don’t know yet whether there were any test sites on the farm but it’s safe to say there were not, and we still do not know about the paramilitary training camps in Belarus.

    There are several witness statements from other farm owners detailing suspicious people around Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory prior to July 22nd.

    If you go with the official Norwegian government line of Breivik the ‘lone wolf’ with no support or network in Norway or further afield then these witnesses and their statements have to be dismissed just like with the telephone call to the ministry.

    We know he has support on a political level in Norway because 2 Democrat MP’s were recorded at a SION conference talking about carrying out terrorist acts against the elected Government that Breivik did actually carry out, but is there an active network in Norway who helped him is the question. There are enough anomalies to the official ‘lone wolf’ lie contained in the witness statements released through the media to say that not everything is as it seems with the official claim. This should give reason to leave the door 'officially' open to the possibility that Breivik did work with others in Norway itself prior to July 22nd who possibly gave him support with constructing the bomb. They would have also had prior knowledge of the planned (inspired) attack which is why they rang the ministry giving a detailed description of what was to come. That’s if it was not Breivik himself and the call definitely took place. This would mean ‘someone’ other than Breivik was making a statement for future reference to help put things into context when the time came which is now.

    If it is a Government white wash of the whole case with it closed down from the very beginning with the official line being that Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’, then all information conflicting with this has to be dismissed regardless of the truth and other possibilities.

    Then you have to question why?

    A witness who lives at a nearby farm to Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory has stated that she saw several men parked up at the farm prior to July 22nd. In the newspaper article it states that she said she is glad she does not have friends like that because they looked big and intimidating (grim). They obviously carried a dark presence that she felt.

    Breivik dismissed these men and said they were Poles looking for work.

    Is Breivik covering up for accomplices who helped him with the final construction of the bomb?

    10 years in the planning, was the success of the bomb critical enough for outside help to have been sent to Breivik for the final construction of the elements to make sure it did not fail when parked outside the Government building?

    As Breivik stated to his arresting officers "its a coup de tat" so the bomb not going off would not have looked very professional.

    The Norwegian police have accepted Breivik’s explanation that it was Poles looking for work, but the only thing with this is that the witness from a nearby farm has stated that she has never had any Poles knock at her farm looking for work.

    It is pretty logical to think that if Poles knocked at Breivik’s farm looking for work then they would have knocked at all surrounding farms looking for work also because this was their plan of action to get work in Norway. Knock at all the farms in the vicinity looking for work. Coincidence and very suspicious if Breivik’s was the only farm these alleged Poles knocked on don’t you think?

    Unless there are other witness statements from other farm owners around Breivik’s farm who confirm the Poles story. If not it’s safe to say Breivik’s explanation does not add up which means there is another explanation and it does not take Einstein to work out another possible explanation in the scheme of things.

    Quote: We have a fairly good view and we have yet no information about any visitor who may be suspicious, said information officer Roar Hanssen in the Oslo police's terrorism investigation.

    The Norwegian police must have several witness statements from adjacent farms to corroborate Breivik’s Poles story then if they have no information about any visitors who may be suspicious. Would be interesting to know seen as though Dagbladet based this article and the information contained in it around suspicious activity based upon witness statements.

    Another witness has stated that he saw a man and a woman standing on the courtyard of Breivik’s farm on July 20th, 2 days before the fateful day.

    The last goodbye…?

    Unless there are other witness statements that support Breivik’s claims that counter the witness statements mentioned here, there is a question of doubt surrounding the visitors to the bomb making farm/factory which should leave the door open for other possibilities.

    All suspicious evidence put together paints a bigger clearer picture if not positively and clearly discounted or explained. The most obvious for the backdrop of the picture has got to be the 2 Democrat MP’s recorded talking about carrying out a coup at a SION conference which cannot be discounted. These Norwegians along with Fraudman “the dog that bites” are facts in the Breivik picture.

    The picture goes against the Government endorsed official line of Breivik the ‘lone wolf’ so there is a question of doubt over the 7 month official line that needs to be addressed in the mainstream media with the door opened to other possibilities and peoples direct involvement.

    Don’t forget about the Norwegian who emailed one of Breivik’s inspirations Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs either. If it was not Breivik who emailed her about a coming armed insurrection in Norway prior to 2011, then it was someone else thinking like Breivik which adds more detail to the overall picture.

    The Norwegian police still, to my knowledge, have not uncovered who Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’ is either, and both of these people are now integral and critical to explaining Breivik’s English mentor role, and why this was placed inside the “2083” manifesto.

    20 February 2012

    A layman's graph (partial)

    Further reading: Ex-Nato army head accused of forming terror group

    Update (graph below):This isn't NATO, this comes from the East with Islamic influence if it is true about the former Soviet Colonel (Chechen moslem convert) who controls the Belarus training grounds, who is also directly linked to Milorad Ulemek and whose political agenda would be to bring down the West by toppling Governments which is in-line with other forces out there in the World today.

    A New Cold War...with Russia playing about with suitcase nuke chemicals in London, killing dissident rogue KGB officers (former Soviets possibly linked to Far West LCC) with the stuff.

    On another note, the black market proliferation of chemical, nuclear and biological weapons to terror groups has got to be one of the biggest threats facing Western Powers and the intelligence community as a whole, and nearly 100 suitcase nukes went missing after the collapse of the Soviet Union after the Cold War. In all probability some of those nukes traded with Bin Laden for Afghan heroin which fueled the rise of the Russian mafia, and I would assume, any rogue former Soviet Colonels/Generals out there with access to their comrades stolen property would have kept a few back in storage for tactical reasons. One can only wonder the Nationalistic rage some former Soviet military leaders have against the West, which would be the same as Serbians like Ulemek after NATO bombed Serbia into submission and carved up their Country on-behalf of the moslems in Europe, killing their men, women and children in the process and then locking up all of their leaders.

    Suitcase nukes have got to be a must in the arsenal of any serious international terror group wanting to wage a war against Nuclear armed Nations in the 21st Century as the ultimate threat or attack.

    This is a partial graph based upon my limited knowledge. The link to the Belarus training camp has still not been confirmed by the Norwegian police prosecutors but there is enough evidence that fits circumstantially at this point in time within the public domain for it to be conceivable, and the same goes with Milorad Ulemek.

    2 key points outside of this partial graph are; Is there enough suspicion around the map coordinate within the manifesto that is located very close to where the MI6 agent was murdered in London for there to be possibly something there, or is it just a coincidence that the murder scene is located so close to a coordinate within Breivik's manifesto.

    Is Far West LCC or any of its associates that span the globe linked in anyway to the European bank for Reconstruction & Development where Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake works/worked?

    9 February 2012

    Breivik enquiry - An anomaly

    Update 10/02/12: Original post below.

    Quote: (wikispooks) The website of the Center for Vigilant Freedom (which now redirects to the rebranded International Civil Liberties Alliance) was registered on 12 December 2006, also by Christine Brim. Brim gave an email address at the Envoy Group, a private consultancy company based in her home town of Fairfax, Virginia.

    Is it a coincidence that the Center for Vigilant Freedom who are behind the SIO groups and their UK branch Civil Liberties Alliance of which Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia are head, who are also behind the hijacked EDL and its European off-shoots is located in Fairfax Virginia?

    Somebody used a dead man from Fairfax Virginia's identity at the start of the Norwegian Defence League when Breivik was a member, so the question is who?
    And how did they obtain their trusted position?

    Was Christine Brim of the Center for Vigilant Freedom in America behind the hijacking of the EDL which brought it under their direct control through Alan Lake and Ann/Gaia, thus supporting my removal and influence which would not be very nice considering it was me who put it together in England my home Country, and I thought we were on the same side after everything when I was State side in 2008/2009.

    Their UK branch leaders withheld vital information to the Breivik mass murder enquiry, and were more than happy and willing to see me stand accused of being behind Breivik when they knew for a fact there was a real life 'Richard the Lionheart' and not me who uses 'Lionheart' linked to their friend Alan Lake and them themselves: Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

    This network had reason and motive to remove me and then out of the blue Breivik strikes and I stand accused (coincidence) which was not a very nice thing when you know you have nothing to do with it, or him.

    Breivik came from this exact ideological network along with his fellow Norwegian Fraudman and I say ideological network as nobody wants to admit association, although we know Breivik attended several EDL demonstrations in the UK.

    I would say Alan Lake infiltrated the anti-jihad movement for his own reasons and that Breivik was his asset and that setting me up for arrest and imprisonment was a part of the agenda because of the 'state of play'.

    A strange anomaly has come to light regarding the Norwegian Defence League when Breivik was a member. Somebody as yet unknown (to those outside of the police investigation) was on the admin of the NDL Facebook group using a dead man from Fairfax Virginia's identity.

    I asked Lena if she was sure this man was admin and she said yes because she was the original group's leader, and I asked if Breivik was a member at the same time and she also said yes.

    Lena was close to Alan Lake at the time of the founding of the Norwegian Defence League before she had served her purpose and was inflicted with a barrage of abuse and a smear campaign to remove her which is the modus operandi of those who control the domain names and groups within the organisation.

    She was also threatened and intimidated by Alan Lake in his attempts to silence her because of what she knows about him due to their involvement together.

    Either Breivik somehow was able to get himself as admin of the NDL facebook group using a dead man from America's identity, or somebody else did at exactly the same time that Breivik was a member of the group which in the 'scheme of things' now is obviously a very strange anomaly in the case.

    Facebook profile: Roar Hogtveit

    Fairfax Virginia: Missing persons

    Memorials website: Mark David Radcliffe

    8 February 2012

    Theresa May: Hero or Villain?

    Guardian: Cameron pushes for deportation deal

    British common sense in the interest of public safety should 'over rule' the judgement by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Abu Qatada, and he should be on the first plane home to Jordan along with his family on Monday morning when British courts plan on releasing him back out onto our streets. This would set a precedent and Abu Hamza can be next and sent off to America to face the terror charges waiting for him there. This will send shockwaves through the Islamic fundamentalist community currently living safely on tax payers benefits in Britain. Then the rest of the undesirables who are a threat to the internal security of Great Britain can be rounded up and sent home too, proving this government is serious about "Defending the Realm" which is the first duty of Government, and not bowing to a European court dictating to British justice which threatens the internal security and safety of our Country.

    Who can complain about expelling Islamic terrorists from our Country?

    Dont forget all of the Islamic fundamentalists in prison either who should be deported at the end of their sentances. If they own a British passport then they should be stripped of them and if born here shipped back to their ancestral homeland for overstaying their families welcome to live amongst us.

    This is a Winston Churchill moment for the ruling Conservative Government that would have the backing of everyone in Britain except sections of the Islamic community, their bleeding heart liberal supporters who will use any situation against those on the right irresepctive of the consequences, and the multi million pound Human Rights lawyers who make their millions off of the backs of Islamic terrorists at the complete detriment to the Country in which they reside.

    Islamic fundamentalists embedded within our society and using our laws against us as a weapon of warfare as part of their Jihad facilitated by their millionaire lawyers at the tax payers expense.

    Put him on the first plane home and then turn to the European court and say "What you going to do about it".

    A historic moment in the current politcal life of Great Britain that he Conservatives will hopefully seize upon that would make Theresa May a National hero.

    The left-wing controlled BBC have added their angle to the debate, this is what they have stated as official policy:

    Quote: BBC journalists have been told not to call hate preacher Abu Qatada an 'extremist'.

    Using such a term to describe the man once called 'Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe', is making a 'value judgment' and should be avoided, bosses have said.

    The corporation’s managers have insisted he should be described as 'radical', according to meeting notes seen by the Telegraph.

    Journalists were also advised not to use images that suggest the preacher is overweight.

    Continue reading: Whose side are they on?

    Breivik the right-wing "Viking"

    That is the codename that was given to him by the Belarusian Security Services after he travelled into their Country to visit Viking graves there, and if true, after also attending a paramilitary training camp run by a former Soviet Colonel.

    We are yet to known for definite from the Norwegians whether or not this is true though which would shed a whole different light on the official story.

    If there were no 'bomb test' sites at the farm Breivik was staying on then its pretty safe to say that he did attend the paramilitary training camp otherwise there is no way he would have been able to construct a bomb capable of blowing up his government building from scratch with no experience and it be as completely successfully like it was
    . He would have had to learn how to construct it and test detonate it somewhere before constructing the actual main bomb on his farm and then carrying out his attack against the government building.

    We don't know yet though.

    Unless he was a genius and constructed the 'massive' bomb from scratch based upon an internet recipe he downloaded, got it perfectly right first time and it worked as successfully as it did, which we are led to believe with the official 'lone wolf' nut label the Norwegian police prosecutors have given him.

    Its no surprise that he was given the codename the "Viking" considering Norway's historical past, and to deny that there are not others out there in Norwegian society on the political right who do not look towards Breivik and support him and his views based upon their own heritage and view of their Country that dates back to the time of the Viking's and the history of that time period is naive. Breivik is the first not just in Norway but all over Europe to go from the talking stage into the violent action stage against the Islamification and immigration invasion of his Country. You might not see this reality about Islamisation and immigration but there are millions all over Europe who do, along with their simmering rage against the governments about it. After seeing him in court yesterday you can see that there will be many all over Europe on the extreme far-right who will now be inspired by him to go from the talking stage into the violent action stage because of what is now befalling them, and being inflicted upon them, their children and their Countries by the political class sitting in their ivory towers dictating to the masses and destroying their Nations. They have Opened up the floodgates and allowed uncontrolled mass immigration from the third world into their Countries, flooding the place with moslems which is completely changing the life and future life of their Nations with mega mosques and Islamic ghettos rising up all around them, with Islam and sharia law taking over areas demographically that can only logically end in one of 2 ways.

    Breivik successfully carried out his terrorist atrocities with the ideological reasons behind them being aligned with their own views. He has left a 1500 page manifesto in the public domain for those who are inspired by him to read and follow suite. He now sits in prison with the worlds media surrounding him giving him the opportunity to spread his European political ideology to the world, which in part is the same as their own. Pretty much everything Breivik has stated can be fitted into context and is completely understandable amongst the right and extreme far-right anti-Islamisation/anti-Immigration side of the European debate.

    He did compile it around the thoughts and opinions of many mainstream commentators after all.

    Breivik is the first, now viewed as a hero amongst many all around the world, who are not personally effected by what happened on Utoya island and you only have to do a search on google or youtube to see this. There were even messages of support sent to his Facebook account immediately after the events.

    If he was an incoherent bumbling madman foaming at the mouth then for him to claim to be a leader as he does would be a part of his madness. But for him to be giving real intelligent reason and answers for his actions and the questions posed, with many people agreeing with him because it is the same as their own thoughts, along with knowing he has others on the outside to continue the work, then to claim that title of leader of the Norwegian resistance movement (political extreme right) regardless of any ones thoughts or feelings about him is the claim of a sane mind. He has stated that he knows he will be vilified now but he has set his/their agenda in place that lasts until what they believe will be "2083" so he knows he will be judged in one way now but believes that in the future he will be judged differently when (in his/their mind) others rise up after him and take the war to the European Marxist elites. His/their agenda is to topple the liberal Marxist governments of Europe and reverse the Islamisation of the continent because to save Europe the Islamisation trend has to be stopped one way or another otherwise the darkness of Islam will cover Europe more than it already is.

    Whilst in court he is also speaking to people in the outside world and not only those inside the courtroom when given the platform to do so with there being people out there in the world who understand him with it all making sense to them regardless of whether or not people label him a madman because they cannot percieve him. That is just a matter of fact and reality. He is not a bumbling foaming at the mouth madman after all. He is also communicating to the terrorist network/group he is a part of along with his new ideological supporters unless of course everything is in his head and nobody agrees with him? Meaning that after over 10 years he has no extreme right-wing contacts out there, was paramilitary trained in his bedroom, obtained money to fund his attack from thin air, wrote the manifesto alone, and then successfully carried out the worst terrorist atrocity in Europe of the 21st Century with it inspiring others to follow his lead.

    For Breivik his target was the Left wing Marxists who have controlled the functioning of State within his Country for generations who have enforced multi-culturalism on the Nation, thus destroying the natural historical and cultural make up of Norway. Turning his homeland it into what he perceives to be a multicultural hell hole, inflicting an epidemic of crime and degradation on many parts of society that will eventually over time spread out beyond its current limits across the Nation as more immigrants arrive bringing with them their foreign third world Islamic ways along with their baby boom, added to the baby boom that is already in place amongst them which over time will again end in only one of two ways.

    Exactly the same as what has happened and is happening all across the UK.

    Islam is the biggest threat within our Judeo/Christian European societies due to the religious mandate laid down in the koran that all moslems must follow. Islam is turning Europe into Eurabia with the help of the liberal left of politics (Marxists) who do not understand the threat that we now face from religious moslems who are outworking their faith amongst us. In many cases our fat-cat Politicians in their ivory towers are just selling us and our Countries out for their own personal ambitions and quick financial gain without looking at the long term implications to us, our children or the future life of our Countries that our forefathers shed blood sweat toil and tears for, for us their descendant's and our children and grandchildren.

    Thankfully in the UK we have some good leaders in the top tier of the Conservative Government.

    Those living outside of the Islamic areas of our Countries in middle class suburbia unaffected by what they can snobbily call cultural enrichment which enables them to have a nice curry once in a while when they venture into these places for an hour or 2, call such talk as racist coming from bigots, and most of those still living inside these areas or who have moved away because of the degradation and explosion of all types of vile crime, in what is called 'white-flight' are the ones who in Norway would agree with some of Breivik's views not his acts, but that is the difference between "Thought & Deed".

    For the Left wing Marxists in power in Norway to listen to Breivik's views would mean that they would then have to confront the issues Breivik has raised because of his acts which then challenges their ideology in the eyes of wider society which would place them in the position of potentially losing power or having to deal with the problem before them within Norwegian society, that many are aggrieved with, that they themselves have created. So its easier for them to white-wash the whole affair and write Breivik off as a 'lone wolf' nut, then everyone can go back to sleep because this National tragedy had no real meaning or purpose as it was just the actions of one man who is certified as insane, thus a madman, whilst the Marxists in government hold onto power and can continue with their multicultural agenda that will eventually destroy the historical cultural identity of Norway.

    This is just the fact of the matter.

    We have no idea of how strong the extreme right-wing in Norway is, how connected they are, or their intent, Breivik does gives us an example though that fits in with other information.

    Breivik has given a 1500 page manifesto justifying and explaining his actions that are based around his fellow Norwegian blogger Fraudman's writings with the manifesto named after one of his own essays. Not only that but Breivik committed exactly the same actions that Norwegian Democrat MP's were recorded talking about at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference.

    People claim that Breivik's views of Norway and Norwegian society are warped and insane.

    If Breivik's views of Norway and Norwegian society are warped and insane then surely these who are linked to Breivik ideologically must be certifiably insane too which includes politicians on the right in Norway?

    The left-wing Marxists in power control all aspects of society through the control of the functioning of State which includes most of the media, police, army and justice system for example. They create laws to protect their agenda outlawing any dissent through fear of arrest, prosecution and imprisonment like with the racism accusation everyone is terrified of. All official bodies that go towards the functioning of State are willing and compliant servants to the day's political agenda handed down by their political masters because it is more then their jobs worth to dissent, and everyone needs to put a roof over their heads and food on the table for their families so their is no dissent. It is just a quiet conversation behind closed doors between people where they complain to one another about what is happening to their Country but do not have the guts to say or do anything about it in public through fear of being branded a racist and losing their jobs.

    Its like the Gestapo in Nazi Germany who stated after the war that they were just following orders whilst the Holocaust happened under their noses.

    No matter how much people like it there are different sides to the National debate about the present and future state of their Country which includes those not from the political class but those in power close down the debate because they have the power to do so just like the NULabour regime in Britain did with all their discrimination laws that persecute the indigenous population who are being displaced from their homes, targeted because of their beliefs and the colour of their skin, along with the laws being used as a cultural weapon in the hands of moslems to silence any argument about their presence and conduct amongst us. As everyone knows, the race card is used at every opportunity to close down debate and bring frivolous prosecutions against innocent people because they dare to challenge injustices carried out by moslems within society. This is why most people in mainstream society keep their mouths closed about what is going on around them as compliant slaves to their governors.

    NULabour's government was/is full of Marxists and Communists which is probably why they had a political agenda to turn the UK into a multicultural hell hole by opening the floodgates to uncontrollable mass immigration and transforming the face of Britain whilst in power.

    Thanks Mr. Blair!

    Those in government also indoctrinate the young minds of the youth to their political agenda through the manipulation of State schools and universities which then creates the next generation with their same liberal multicultural view point regardless to whether or not their social experiment worked which it has not. Today's European leaders have all now come to the conclusion that multiculturalism doesn't work and has failed which really relates to Islam and its presence amongst us because most of the time all other communities get along because they understand mutual respect that brings peace because they are not governed by a belief system that is rooted in a 7th Century hate manual called the koran and its accompanying books.

    The European governments claim of multiculturalism has failed comes after all the damage to society has already been done, leaving a massive social mess that is a direct threat to the life and future life of the Nation that needs to be cleaned up somehow with hundreds of thousands of immigrants all over the world still with their sights set on entering our Countries every year, bleeding our Countries dry and taking over from within.

    No matter how horrific and repulsive Breivik's acts were on Utoya island, and how nobody wants to accept what he did, he gave his reason for doing it because he said these were the next generation of Marxist leaders who were going to continue destroying Norway. This was not the act of a 'madman' this was a cold calculated move by an extreme right-wing political terrorist who after the event told his arresting officers that they were not the enemy and that it was a coup de tat.

    He targeted those who he perceived were responsible or going to be responsible for continuing to destroy Norway.

    The white-washing of the whole events by the Norwegian government relegates Breivik's acts to that of someone who is insane which means he did not have a point, his views about Norwegian society are wrong and meaningless, and nothing makes sense because he is insane, thus a "madman" and they have to stick to that line because it is a direct threat their political ideology and State power.

    They have the power because they are in control so they dictate everything from the top down.

    Everything Breivik has said (what I have seen) seems to make sense if you understand his view point and are coming at it with similar knowledge of the political right-wing movement out there. If you do not understand his view point, have no knowledge of the views and opinions of the right-wing ideological world he comes from, and you do not know all of the facts concerning the network/group (white-wash) then he sounds like a "madman" with it all delusions in his mind like his first psychiatric report stated that has been condemned by most leading people in the field of psychiatry who are following the case which proves the Norwegian government have attempted to close the case down and white-wash it by labelling Breivik a paranoid schizophrenic.

    In other words, if your political and social ideology is similar to Breivik's then you are a State sanctioned paranoid schizophrenic.

    The head of the PST has resigned which gives hope that the full truth will come out, and the PST as an organisation have stated that they do not want another political appointment as head. Why is that? because a political appointment is a lacky to his/her political masters who are those in government who Breivik targeted for being Marxists destroying Norwegian society. This would mean a continued Norwegian government controlled and influenced investigation and 'white-wash' of the whole affair which is not in the interest of truth and justice that the PST as an organisation is founded upon. They would ultimately be just another political tool in the hands of their government masters to be used against anyone who opposes them.

    I do not support Anders Breivik but I do understand some of his political ideology that I have seen and do not believe he is insane or a 'lone wolf', he is an extreme right-wing political terrorist and a part of a European movement against the Islamisation/Immigrant invasion of Europe. He is the first to commit a terrorist attack as a part of that ideological movement that is comprised of many different groups and individuals all over Europe and inparticular the group/network I believe Breivik comes from which Alan Lake belongs to who I believe is the English 'mentor'.

    6 February 2012

    Alan Lake Breivik's controller

    There is now no doubt in my mind about Alan Lake being Anders Breivik's controller linked to his terrorist atrocities in Norway on July 22nd 2011.

    For 6 months after being 'framed' as Breivik's English 'mentor' I have been trying to work out if I was right in my belief that Alan Lake & Co were the ones who set me up which would mean they were directly linked to Breivik himself and his actions. All circumstantial evidence pointed in his direction but there was one massive missing piece of the mental jigsaw puzzle that I just could not work out.

    How could Alan Lake possibly be linked to the Balkans, Serbians and maybe even Russians.

    The big missing link to my mental picture to make it complete.

    Then this week Tash Shifrin thankfully released the information that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake had been suspended from his job within a major London bank where he worked as the manager over their Oracle database.

    I checked the website of the bank and clicked on the 'about us' page and the Balkans jumped out of the page at me. Alan Lake working in a trusted position within an international bank directly linked to the Balkans and obviously Serbians?

    This is no ordinary bank like Barclay's or RBS either, everything is in the name of this bank that Lake was working for: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

    It is an independent bank supported by international Governments dealing with Reconstruction and Development in Countries emerging from war exactly like in the Balkans pre 2002, and broken Countries that need assistance in development just like the name states.

    A powerful international European bank with a political mandate.

    You can check their website yourself to see the good work that the bank is currently doing in helping developing Nations, and the work in other Countries they are intending to do, but as with everything there is always the chance that criminals at some level get involved with such large organisations and operate under the cover of the organisation until found out. This happens in life in any major company where criminals work out the system from the inside, find fellow criminals and then abuse the system for their financial advantage, or as in this case political advantage due to the nature of the bank and its work. Sometimes this abuse can reflect extremely badly on the image of the organisation/company depending on the type of organisation/company it is, and in other instances its just a case of a financial lose through fraud or theft.

    Alan Ayling operating under his alias Alan Lake has the potential to damage the reputation of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development because of his extra curricula political activities, and his direct connection to the Anders Breivik mass murder enquiry because people will now be asking questions and want answers about their employee and his activities.

    Considering all of his work in the UK as director behind the EDL and his links into the European anti-Jihad movement that includes Sweden where he has contacts in the Swedish Government and even Norway itself where Breivik struck, you could argue that the damage is already done unless the Chief Executives issue a public statement distancing themselves from their employee Alan Ayling.

    Unless they have the bury your head in the sand syndrome concerning such a serious situation their bank is now implicated in.

    To have only suspended him when their is evidence all over the internet about his extra curricula political activities and not sacked him with immediate effect does not bode well on the banks future public image around the World. At least if they had of sacked him with immediate effect the public would have perceived the Chief Executives acted immediately over something of such a serious nature that they had no knowledge of when it was brought to their attention. This did not happen.

    Either the Chief Executives of the bank know about Alan Ayling's extra curricula political activities, and his direct link to the Anders Breivik mass murder enquiry and endorse him and support him, or they do not?

    I go with they did not.

    That's a question for others to ask them though that the Norwegian and British public will now want to know, not least for Norway where he is alleged to be linked to Anders Breivik who massacred 69 innocent kids on their summer camp and blew up the Government building killing 8 people inside, but also here in the UK where he has been directing the hijacked EDL and costing the British tax-payer millions whilst working as an employee inside their bank that has a political mandate in foreign Countries, even wanting to go into Islamic Countries.

    If they do not support him or endorse him, then along with a public statement the only way they can prove this is by conducting their own internal and transparent investigation into his work activities internally to see if he has been abusing his trusted position and is involved in criminal activity within the structure of the bank along with others, whilst the Norwegian and British police continue to carry out their investigations into his extra curricula political activities, and his links to Anders Breivik and the massacre in Norway.

    Alan Ayling was not just floor staff either, he was the trusted 'manager' of the banks Oracle database overseeing a whole team of employee's.

    I have absolutely no idea what the Oracle database is or what it does but it must play an important function of the bank and Lake was the trusted man for the job. How did he attain that trusted position?

    You could ask yourself; what was their trusted manager doing directing the EDL street protest movement and how did it all happen? Was Alan Ayling recruited into a secret group with a funny handshake by other employee's of the bank who were unknowingly abusing their positions from within and needed others to help as an extension of their criminal work?

    You cannot say this does not go on!

    Its all about the money for some people.

    I am all for secretive groups with funny handshakes planning and plotting for the defence of Queen & Country but this group behind Breivik are not for Queen & Country.

    Most people reading this worry about their mortgage payments, car payments, mobile phone bill or internet bill etc which are small amounts of money being transferred around banks like Barclay's or RBS, where as major criminal and terrorist organisations worry about transferring many millions of pounds, euros and dollars around international banks via enterprises like arms trading, drug smuggling to fund conflicts and terrorist campaigns.

    What would your local Barclay's bank branch manager think if millions of pounds were being transferred through your accounts?

    It would definitely raise his suspicions that's for sure.

    But what if you were working in a bank use to multi million pound transfers being switched around accounts, working in developing Countries and war torn Countries and you had paid willing accomplices on the inside so as to not raise suspicions over the criminal enterprise?

    Money laundering.

    Would a bank like the one Alan Lake worked for be the type of bank that large sums of money could be passed around without much suspicion? And considering the nature of the work the bank does and the Countries it works in would it be possible that it has gone on under the nose of the Chief Executives by a network of compliant criminal employee's like Alan Ayling?

    Breivik was chosen by someone for some reason and sent as an errand boy to Liberia in 2002 with all probability the reason for the trip being about arms trading amongst other things, considering it was at a time when the Country was gripped in a bloody civil war. Breivik has stated that there were other reasons why he went to Liberia other than meeting his Serbian contact which would tie in with being an errand boy for arms traders. After this trip to Liberia he then travelled to London where he has stated that the founding meeting of the secretive militant right-wing group was formed. Could it be possible that members of that group, especially his English 'mentor' were part of the financial side of the international arms trade which would mean working on the inside of a large international bank based in London? Or having someone on the inside?

    Further reading: Birth & Baptism of Anders Breivik

    It is highly likely that Breivik was recruited because of his father who was the Norwegian diplomat to London in 2002. Its not unheard of that some diplomats have dual roles as spies either, so Breivik probably came to someones attention as a useful young recruit into a neo-Gladio style group. Did Breivik's father have any dealings with Alan Ayling's bank whilst working in his capacity as the Norwegian diplomat to London? If you type Norway into the banks website search engine you will see that Norway is a financial backer of this bank so the possibility is there.

    That's for the Norwegian investigators to find out.

    Breivik's father obviously fears something because he refuses to travel to Norway to answer questions which says allot about the man. A man who was entrusted to be the representative of the Norwegian people as a government diplomat in a foreign Country who now refuses to travel back to his native homeland to answer questions over such a serious matter that has effected the Nation. That leaves the very real thought that he must have something to hide with regards to his son and how his son ended up as an extreme right-wing political terrorist who has committed the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century and committed a crime against humanity.

    It all starts to make much more sense now, and is the reason behind the British press refusing to report on Alan Lake this self explanatory considering who his employer is?

    One thing is for sure is that if Alan Ayling was working inside this particular bank in 2002 then that is another nail in his coffin concerning his direct involvement with Anders Breivik.

    Breivik's map co-ordinates

    I'm not going to go into my full hypothesis of this now because there are missing and conflicting pieces of information.

    There are 46 map co-ordinates inside Breivik's manifesto, a few of them are near Islamic buildings, Islamic ghetto's and places related to Islam and the political left. The rest are linked to no where at all, or anywhere of any real significance except one, and its not likely with everyone knowing these places that they are ever going to be bombed by Breivik's accomplices. They are all pretty irrelevant places anyway and not worth bombing if you were a terrorist so what is the meaning of them?

    The one significant location pictured above is placed a stones throw from where the MI6 agent Gareth Evans was murdered and placed inside a North Face bag.

    If you go North from London what Country is facing you? Norway

    Both coincidences? Maybe

    There is a college near the Pimplico location giving diplomas in Islamic finances though so it might just all be a coincidence, but if you were an MI5 or MI6 agent would it raise your suspicion in the scheme of things considering one of your own was murdered in that exact location that has turned up as a map coordinate in Breivik's manifesto?

    All 45 locations in the map coordinates are pretty much irrelevant (red herrings) but the extra one is a stones throw from the unsolved murder of an MI6 agent.

    Was this a finger print placed in there by the group behind Breivik?

    Gareth Evans was said to have been working on a project called Echelon tracing the financial proceeds of Russian organised crime (arms trading and drugs) into and around Europe. In other words millions of pounds, euros and dollars being transferred around banks disguised as legitimate business transactions.

    Could Gareth Evans murder be linked to Anders Breivik and ultimately the people behind Anders Breivik?

    I am sure William Hague would like to know considering Mr. Evans was one of his employee's, and I am sure his fellow MI6 officers would like to know unless they already know but just cannot prove it.

    Did the European bank for Reconstruction and Development ever come up on Gareth Evans radar whilst tracing black market money?

    William Hague knows the answer, and if yes then there is scope for a hypothesis based upon facts.

    We are still yet to know if the former Soviet Colonel linked to the Belarus training camps was behind Breivik's schooling in the art of terrorism which would shed more light on eveything?

    5 February 2012

    Breivik expected someone to be arrested

    There was some interesting articles in the Norwegian press yesterday covering some aspects of the Breivik enquiry and his statements to the police. There are 2 in particular that relate to me, one in Dagbladet concerning a snippet of his police interview and another in VG attempting to link me to Milorad Ulemek who is said to be the Serbian warlord Breivik visited in Liberia.

    Dagbladet: Breivik expected an arrest

    You cannot really understand the context of the Dagbladet article from google translate but there are key parts you can which are very interesting, especially this part: quote Breivik during interrogation: Sure police have arrested an "order of brother"

    (AP) In his solitary confinement at Ila, Anders Breivik Behring convinced themselves that the police have arrested a "brother" after 22 July.

    Considering I was almost immediately labelled as his English 'mentor' because of the very obvious pointers placed within the manifesto it is more than likely that I am the person Breivik was sure the police had arrested. There was nobody else on the radar or who fitted the profile at that time but me so I will go with the assumption that it was me in his mind at that point.

    I have said from the very beginning that I was set up for arrest and imprisonment by Breivik and whoever his real English 'mentor' is.

    Breivik committed his terrorist acts, released the manifesto with his Knights Templar claims, said there were more terrorist cells out there ready to strike and conveniently pointed everyone in my direction where I have 5 years of work stating my beliefs and ideology that on the outside could easily be mistaken to be the same as Breivik's. This
    is why the media spread the misconception that I was his inspiration which was then spread around the World and set the stage for the media story concerning me.

    Taking the flack away from his real network in England.

    I was not alleged to be his inspiration I was alleged to be his English 'mentor' based upon facts, most importantly, but not exclusively, his trip to London in 2002 after his trip to Liberia which is completely different from being someones inspiration. I wont rule out that Breivik & Co might have stolen the ideology surrounding me and this blog and have used it to wrap up their right-wing terror campaign in, and in the process conveniently set me up.

    Alan Lake's hijacked EDL is a prime example of this scenario.

    It is my belief that somebody somewhere said 'no' concerning me when I was placed on the table as a co-conspirator which is the reason why I was not immediately arrested under the prevention of terrorism act and locked up as an accomplice to Breivik which is exactly what he was expecting which is why he says he was sure the police had arrested someone.

    That was his plan!

    To have me arrested...

    That was obviously not a very nice thing for him to do to me was it?

    He wanted me to be arrested, and expected me to be arrested (even telling the police this), exactly as I have stated from the very beginning so the reason is why?

    It was a hostile move by Breivik and whoever is behind him, that thankfully someone gave me the opportunity to refute contrary to how implicated Breivik & Co had made me look. This is why from the very beginning I said I would travel to Norway irrespective of all of the consequences because I knew myself that Breivik had absolutely nothing to do with me and there was no way I was going to allow anyone to label me as an accomplice in the worst act of right-wing terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century that resulted in 69 innocent kids being massacred on their summer camp including scores wounded.

    If you were me what would you do if you knew it had absolutely nothing to do with you?

    If I had of been arrested as was planned and expected by Breivik himself, and whoever is involved with him, then I would never have been able to defend myself or get to the bottom of where I believe the attack came from which was the whole objective of the exercise from their point of view. Thus silencing me and removing me from being a threat to anyone (plural).

    Who was I a threat to who is overwhelmingly circumstantially linked to Breivik?

    Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake and his wealthy and politically influential cabal.

    Alan Lake would definitely not now be under suspicion for being Breivik's real English 'mentor' if I was in prison and him and his little cabal would definitely not have been brought out into the open where even more suspicion about their involvement with Breivik and other peoples involvement could be seen and investigated.

    There must be someone out there who likes me when faced with this godless dark and dirty group of extreme right-wingers and their political supporters who attempted to set me up to be a fall guy so as to remove me from being a continued threat to them and their political agenda.

    I was on the same page as this network at one point in time with regards to the Islamisation of Britain and Europe, but they chose to make their bed and back their IRA supporting drug dealing horse and now they must lay in it, and removing me from being an obstacle and thorn in their side was a must, no ifs or buts, I had to go. Then all of a sudden out of the blue along comes superman Breivik who we are led to believe is a 'lone wolf' nut who carried out his acts from start to finish alone, and also attempted to have me arrested for some reason as a part of his agenda.

    What was his reason behind that move?

    Quote: I know him and he knows me. He is affiliated with the same network as I am associated with, the Knights Templar, answering Breivik, who emphasizes that he is not worried but "amazed".

    Like I say, at one time I was affiliated with Alan Lake and his cabal but they might as well be moslem is my opinion of them.

    After Breivik setting me up in his manifesto, claiming to know me and that I know him, if it is me he talks of, it is more lies to make the exercise complete. He has just committed his atrocities, set me up as a fall guy so whats the big deal about continuing to lie to re-enforce the belief in the eyes of the investigators that I am involved with him so as to have me arrested under the prevention of terrorism act which was the plan in the first place.

    Its not rocket science...

    Quote: He believes that he has not made any critical errors that make the police can find the accomplices he claims to have.

    - You will not find anything on Facebook, and the threads that I feared you would come across if you were re-opened my accounts there. I believe that I have not made any critical errors. So I'm really not sure, then. On how you have done it, says Breivik.

    Breivik obviously was not talking about me here as part of his network or accomplice because he had already blatantly sold me out. This re-enforces my belief that he set me up because he has contradicted himself if I was involved as an accomplice based upon how obvious his pointers in my direction were.

    Which means as I say, he set me up and then the question is why?

    What is it that the Norwegian police have worked out?

    Hopefully not about me because it was not difficult.

    Quote: He continues to claim that these are the two other Norwegian terror cells, which he has talked about since his arrest on Utøya. During the investigation police have not found any traces of either terrorist organization, or other intermediaries.

    In the days after Breivik's attacks it emerged that Norwegian opposition politicians were recorded talking about blowing up the government and assassinating government figures. They were subsequently arrested because of the nature of the threats contained in their recorded conversations.

    Breivik did exactly what they were recorded talking about and was involved with the same ideological network in Norway.

    The Norwegian opposition politicians conversations were recorded at a
    Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference that is directly linked to Alan Lake and his cabal who in my belief are linked to Breivik.


    Further reading: Democrat spokesman recorded talking about killing MP's

    Further reading: Norwegian domestic terror cell

    4 February 2012

    Breivik's explanation of Liberia

    Foreword: To anyone with an ounce of analytical intelligence its blatantly obvious that Anders Breivik is telling the truth about his trips to Liberia and London, but for the Norwegian police they choose to deny the truth which either shows their competence as investigators or proves there is a high level Government white-wash of the whole affair because somebody somewhere knows more than they want the Norwegian people to know about Breivik and who he is involved with, so they want Breivik to be written off as a 'lone wolf' nut.

    Further reading: PST is an international pipsqueak

    In January, said prosecutor Christian Hatlo that the police have not found anything to suggest that Behring Breivik's alleged terrorist organization, with more cells actually exist.

    They have not uncovered anything to suggest that a ordineringsmøte took place in London in 2002, so he claims.

    - For each day that passes, we become more confident that the network does not exist, said Hatlo.

    Nobody would travel to the Liberian civil war in 2002 without reason (obvious). Breivik gives his reason that it was part of his recruitment into a militant extreme right-wing group and specifically to meet a Serbian who he was to represent 2 - 3 weeks later in London. His cover story was that he went to Liberia for blood diamonds (obvious). He did not purchase any blood diamonds while there and instead bought some rough diamonds from a Norway dealer, with the diamonds he bought actually being from Australia or Thailand.

    You can safely say blood diamonds was not the real reason for the trip if he had to buy diamonds from Norway that came from Australia or Thailand
    when he was sitting in a place (Liberia) over flowing with blood diamonds and did not own any from there. He obviously bought these to keep up his Liberian cover story just in case. Its highly unlikely Breivik would have taken diamonds out of Liberia anyway because if he had of been caught with them then he would have ended up in the Hague for breaking UN embargo's placed upon Liberia which would have jeopardised the real reason behind the trip and destroyed everything he had been working towards.

    Straight after Liberia he then ends up in London and claims he attended a secretive meeting where he is said to have been representing his new Serbian contact he met in Liberia.

    The explanations for both trips is completely plausible based upon the facts and points to the fact that there are others involved with Breivik which would mean just like Breivik states, there is a group/network involved with him which sheds a completely different light on the whole thing.

    He went to both of these locations several weeks apart so what was he doing if not what he states?

    Yet Christian Halto the Police prosecutor states there is no evidence that Breivik is part of a group/network or involved with anyone?

    Breivik must have just been a happy go lucky war tourist in 2002 who for some reason coincidentally turned out to be an extreme right-wing political terrorist in 2011. Pull the other one!

    I wonder what explanation Christian Halto has for both of these trips that counters Breivik's claims about them and supports his claim of 'no evidence'?

    Would be very interesting to hear the Norwegian police's explanation that brings them to their official conclusion.

    The first psychiatric report was based around this official conclusion so how could the report state anything other than Breivik was delusional. They were basing their report on the official conclusion that there is nobody involved with Breivik so his I's and We's must have been delusions because as far as the police are concerned they do not exist, so are all in his own mind, thus certified as schizophrenic.

    How could the report contradict the police?

    Further reading: Birth & Baptism of Anders Breivik

    What would it mean (all the implications) if the Norwegian police had to now turn around and state that Breivik is part of a group/network?

    Aftenposten: Breivik's Liberia trip

    Google translated

    In April 2002, traveled Behring Breivik to Liberia through the Ivory Coast. The aim of the trip was to meet a Serb in Liberia that he should be representative of the establishment meeting of the alleged organization Knights Templar in London later that same spring.

    Before this could happen he had to perform physical and mental "trials".

    In questioning the Behring Breivik said that he told the airport authorities at the landing in Ivory Coast that he was working for the UN Children's Fund, UNICEF.

    He was afraid not to come into the country, but found that the cover was "unnecessary" when he could just pay the money for security guards to enter.


    Bernt G. Apeland, Secretary General of UNICEF Norway was not aware of the terror accused to have used UNICEF as cover.

    - It is sad that regardless of any abuse of a voluntary organization's good name and reputation, and claiming to be different than the one. It is especially bad in this serious case, where the perpetrator has committed atrocious acts against young people, as we work to protect children, said Apeland.

    "The Trial"

    From the capital of Ivory Coast, he took the plane to Liberia. According to him, he was the only passenger on the plane, but two Russian prostitute.

    In questioning Behring Breivik believes saying that the timing of the trip was around 8 to 10. April, some weeks before he was on the alleged founding meeting of the organization Knights Templar in London.

    According to Aftenposten know the police have confirmed that Behring Breivik lived at a specific hotel in Liberia as a guest between 18 April and 28 april 2002.

    In interviews he has explained that the journey itself was "an ordeal". He said he had to get into the country and "finance this themselves to prove their dedication."


    He will not tell anything about how the trials went on, but says that "he had several trials before the trip, up to six months before and after the trip." It was both the physical and the mental ", the Behring Breivik have said in interviews.

    He also explained to police that there were other purposes of the trip than the trials. (errand boy for arms traders?)

    "It was the coaching of the most theoretical aspects, such as on revolutionary science," he explained.

    He describes the trip as "fascinating". Part of the purpose was that he would be "deputies to the person who was in Liberia and represent him at the meeting."

    The meeting he's talking about would take place in London a few weeks later. Behring Breivik believes that this meeting was the inaugural meeting of the organization Knights Templar.

    "Two or three weeks"

    According to Aftenposten is familiar with the Behring Breivik said that he was in Liberia for two to three weeks, including the stay in Ivory Coast, but that he was in Liberia for a continuous period.

    He will not say there were others with him in Liberia who was on probation on an equal footing with him.

    Behring Breivik says he had "bodyguards" during his stay in the African country and has testified that he was outside a lot during the stay of safety.

    His lawyer, Geir Lippestad, would not comment on the interrogations.

    - Does not exist

    In January, said prosecutor Christian Hatlo that the police have not found anything to suggest that Behring Breivik's alleged terrorist organization, with more cells actually exist.

    They have not uncovered anything to suggest that a ordineringsmøte took place in London in 2002, so he claims.

    - For each day that passes, we become more confident that the network does not exist, said Hatlo.