22 December 2012

Someone has awoken to the truth in Norway


At least someone has awoken to the truth in Norway, lets hope that Hildur Bakker makes it her duty to get to the bottom of the truth surrounding her sisters brutal and unnecessary murder.

The police took over 1 hour to respond to all of the emergency calls and arrive on Utoya to stop the massacre, this led to her sisters murder which was one of the last and should never have happened.

Who is responsible?

Nobody in Norway it seems...

Was her little sister expendable cannon fodder for a political project orchestrated by evil men?

Lucky how Eskil Pedersen the AUF Leader escaped the bloodbath that fateful day isn't it?

Quote: But you get to a point where you are not being heard, where it is not allowed to criticize, and where there is a core group that will decide exactly what we all should think and say. When there was nothing else to do but to resign.

Aftenposten: Nobody can question or criticise
Facebook thread: Supportive links



28 November 2012

"Tommy" charged with fraud


Luton Today: EDL leaders charged with mortgage fraud

Makes you wonder where all the money donated to the English Defence League cause over the past few years has ended up?

The money was definitely not used constructively that's for sure.

This fraud stems from him trying to hide the proceeds of his cocaine dealing operation, with the drugs he sold being supplied by the Pakistani moslem drug gangs in Luton who he works/worked for.

Everyone on street level from the area knows the truth...its common knowledge on the streets.  Those who do not live in and around Luton, Dunstable and surrounding areas cannot pass a comment on a subject they know nothing about.

Notice how its his brother in-law on the drugs charge and not him.

Quote: Stephen Vowles, 24, of Heron Drive, Luton, with two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by false representation in relation to a mortgage application, two counts of false accounting, possession of cocaine with intent to supply, being concerned in the supply of class A drugs to another, and money laundering:

This charge all stems from the points in the video below, and word is that he also sold out the young guy who is currently serving a long sentence for cocaine and firearms mentioned at the end of the video.

He also sold out the identities of 53 of his most loyal followers by throwing them into a removals van and driving straight into a police sting operation before being remanded.

26 November 2012

Steven aka "Tommy's" new reality


Those who cover-up for paedophiles some would say are as bad as the paedophiles themselves. Steven aka "Tommy" is surrounded by them now so lets hope he thinks about the innocent child victims at the end of the cover-story they attempted for Richard Price in the name of the English Defence League.


Galatians 6:7

Blog:
EDL Noncegate

23 November 2012

Breivik's Polish link


A Polish professor was recently arrested for planning to blow up his Government building the same as Breivik.

He was traced and uncovered as part of the investigation into Breivik and his international contacts.

This dispels the 'official' Norwegian myth of Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one when this one track has led to a Polish professor getting ready to wipe out his Government just like Breivik attempted.

Although the mainstream media will not report critically on the Norwegian story concerning Breivik and the completely false 'official' conclusion that has yet to be ripped to shreds just like the state of the Norwegian State infrastructure through the July 22nd Commission report and the State's prosecution case against Breivik that they took to court in front of the Worlds media.

How damaging will it be when the 'official' Norwegian conclusion is proven to be false? Who in Norway will take responsibility?

What would a thorough investigation into the Norwegian police's investigation into 'Operation Breivik' show?

That Breivik was not a "solo terrorist" as the Norwegians in control of the case have consistently stated which then begs the question as to why they would want to cover-up the truth and refuse to admit that Breivik is/was connected to others?  This recent Polish arrest proves the point in question.

Not a hard one is it...

'Operation Breivik' & The Norwegian political project at a time when Norway takes center stage in a new Cold War being played out in the Arctic Circle for oil & gas.

All roads behind Breivik lead to Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake the EU banker and City of London employee accept he is protected by people in the deep dark recesses of society which means at this stage the outstanding evidence surrounding him is being ignored in the public sphere.

What if Breivik was Gladio or from a similar group and is linked to Lake in London?  This means his network are able to work outside of the law because him and his contacts are beyond the reaches of the law that is supposed to protect and defend all people within a Democracy.

Anyone complicit in the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent misguided kids on their summer camp in the name of politics should be held to account and not protected by influential figures either in the military or politics.

Someone was behind Breivik, so the question is who?

Who is Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' who was present at the pre-founding EDL meeting, who Lake deemed important enough to invite to that meeting, along with the employee of a Companion of Honour Ann Marchini which is another example of the high level political influence of this group to avoid serious police investigation over Breivik.

Imagine the reputations on the line high up within the British Establishment if is it proven that Lake & Co were behind Breivik.

2 Tier justice - The rich & the poor.

Quote: "Breivik allegedly bought some of the chemicals used for his bomb attack on Oslo in Poland, and the prime minister said that the investigation into his Polish contacts had led the authorities to Brunon K."

Continue reading: Poland's Breivik

13 November 2012

Royal Navy - Selling secrets to Russia

This is in keeping with the Russian espionage and asymmetric warfare angle on the Breivik case which is my personal opinion on the whole affair, which sees an aggressive Russia leaving footprints all over the World now that declare the Nations intent and position in the modern World.

Truth is Truth.

Maybe MI5 should thoroughly investigate Alan Lake who worked in the Square Mile London inside the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development that has had a mandate in the former Soviet Bloc Countries and Serbia, and reveal who his friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is.  Then we can determine with public evidence based upon this persons profile whether the Norwegian State controllers in control of the investigation into the massacre in Norway who say he was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one are right or wrong.  Either Breivik was superhuman which is why he was able to carry out a faultless terrorist mission with uncanny help from the Norwegian police or he is connected to others as he says.

The silence is deafening surrounding Alan Lake the Square Mile employee and Counter-jihad activist who was/is the director behind the hijacked EDL who is also connected to Breivik's ideological movement and members of that movement mentioned by Breivik himself inside the "2083" manifesto, along with him having direct links into Norway including the political class (go through the pages of this blog).

Who is Lake's controller is the question or what funny handshake group does he belong too?

What connections does he have with political, financial and intellectual Russians via his EU bank job?

None or some if MI5/MI6 have done their jobs properly, and if some then what are their stories/profiles?

Who Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is is still the big missing question that has been refused to be answered by everyone in control of the Breivik case until this moment in time which says all you need to know about the real people behind 'Operation Breivik' and their influence especially in Norway where they have been able to completely close the investigative case down on Government level and publicly claim Breivik was/is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which means there is nobody else to look for.

Very convenient...

If my assumption based upon facts is right then Lake is the first domino to fall which would inevitably lead to others higher up the social political financial ladder, its just how far and how high does the domino effect lead?

His immediate connections are the first because they hold direct evidence.

Those innocent misguided kids on Utoya were cannon fodder for a political project in Norway at a time when Norway takes center stage in a new Cold War scenario being played out in the Arctic circle for access and control over the last remaining 30% of Earths natural energy resources and the hundreds of billions of dollars on offer.

 

Enemy of the State: Royal Navy officer faces jail after being caught trying to pass nuclear submarine secrets to Russians in MI5 sting

Edward Devenney was filmed trying to leak sensitive information by British Secret Services

He thought he was meeting Russian spies but it was MI5

The 30-year-old offered code-breaking secrets and data about submarine movements He will be sentenced next month after admitting breaching Official Secrets Act

Continue reading: Enemy of the State

7 September 2012

Former gangster becomes a Vicar

Daily Mail

A former 'gangster' who used to steal lead from church roofs has swapped his life of crime and turned to the church and become a vicar.

Reverend Mark Rowan, 41, who spent more than 17 years in and out of jail for a variety of drugs, theft and violent offences has seen the light and changed his ways.

But former gang leader Mark - who had previously 'only gone to church to steal lead from the roof' - saw the light during a prolonged spell inside and swapped his criminal career for a life of prayer.

Continue reading: Former gangster becomes a Vicar

Video: Davy Falcus Story - Gangland to God



3 September 2012

Dappy 'Good Intentions' Mr Woo Mix

Noria hackers doing a public service

Aftenposten: Dont rule out another July 22nd

An Norwegian investigative journalist was given the hacked email account contents of Anders Breivik email accounts containing over 7,000 emails.

Probably the data the Norwegian police were unwilling to check.


These emails have now been fully investigated with some emails still not understood, with the journalist who was handed the material releasing a book explaining Breivik's email correspondences and how it fits into line with other infomation released in the case. This will give a much better insight and perspective to the real story surrounding 'Operation Breivik'.

Quote: Monday he came with the book "Massemord's private e-mails," which is based on e-mails he received. - May have been affected Stormark believe some of the emails suggest that Breivik may have been influenced by others prior to the implementation of terrorist attacks. - The extent of the contact suggests that there may be psychological involvement, ie people who have motivated Breivik to do what he did 22 July. And only the small chance, that there can be no such thing in this case, that we can experience 22 July again, makes this matter still must be investigated with great conviction, he said at the press conference.

Exactly what I have been saying and what the Norwegian police in charge of the Breivik case have been refusing to admit up until this point in time.

Quote:Unable to check all the author says that in some cases know a lot about the senders of e-mails, while others have been good at hiding their tracks. - How have you researched the authenticity of the e-mails? - I have done using verifiable information confirmed by other sources, for example, witness information or information that the police have gone out with. I have acquired a large amount of material that introduces each chapter, explained Stormark.

VG: Full Noria article

21st Century political persecution in Ukraine

Heroine of Ukraine's Orange Revolution begs West to act against 'Mafia Godfathers' who have taken her country

Daily mail: Heroine of Ukraine's Orange Revolution

1 September 2012

Response to Guardian article

My statements are written on this blog, and Nick's statement is written in the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet so when you quote my name please get your story straight first so as to not fool and mislead your audience with your words that could come back to bite you.

Dagbladet: Nick's public statement

Guardian article:
British far-right support Breivik

I have my own picture of reality too.

Ebook: The Key of David

30 August 2012

Norway's Arctic gold rush

This week in Norway has been like something out of an old American boomtown gold rush, only this time the black liquid gold type of the 21st Century as it is now full steam ahead in Norway to exploit the oil riches in the Arctic region right up to the North Pole where they want to start drilling.

There has been high drama from all sides as the plot unfolds in plain site now.

It is funny how I wrote about ‘Operation Breivik’ being connected to the Norwegian international oil & gas industry as my conclusion to the event and as soon as the storm seems to have passed concerning Breivik and the Norwegian Governments complete failure to stop him and his attacks what is left is the new political drama that is about to unfold which is the norwegian oil & gas industry which has been playing out behind the scenes in those secret places the uninitiated cannot tread.

It is the same Government Breivik professed to be against who benefitted most from his terrorist attacks who are now disregarding the Norwegian political debate as they clamber like blood thirsty wolves for the riches on offer in the North pole under the direction of a Government minister.

Do not be surprised if next week the Arctic region is all over the international news with commentators and pundits discussing the moves North into this region and the geo-political players involved and the consequences considering there is a Cold War scenario taking place there out of sight and mind of mainstream society.

Maybe now it is time for it to be in the public psyche considering it has consequences for all of us and it is a matter of fact about what is going on in this region.

The curtains have been pulled back and the actors will now take to the stage as they position themselves for their own slice of the cake which is in their own National interests as it is part of their own territorial claim too, and there is not much left of the stuff either which makes this region ever more important. Norway has set the stage, and for some unknown reason has severed ties with the Russians in this rush even after signing the deals for access to the gas fields further south in the Russian/Norwegian border. They now claim the project is to costly.

Norway have placed Russia on the sidelines...I wonder how President Putin is going to take that one?

The most contentious issue within the Norwegian political scene is a faction within the ruling AUF-Labour Government’s insistence to drill into the North Pole contrary to the Prime Ministers wishes and voices of the opposition, with his Foreign Secretary claiming he is the boss of the North pole and what goes on there is under his control. This is the same oil man already getting rich from Norway’s inherited wealth and looks like it now places a direct confrontation within the very top of the Norwegian Government if my google translate is correct, with the same man tipped to be the next Prime Minister. He is only a front man to the big boys behind him so it will be interesting to see how this scenario is now played out in full view of the media.

Politics Power & Money...which ultimately ‘Operation Breivik’was all about, just covered up for the masses on their level to keep their minds occupied as right-wing extremism away from the real important political issues, with 69 innocent Norwegians kids expendable as part of their short to long term political project.

An opposition member put it bluntly with these few comments.

Quote: We have an oil extremist as minister. The Prime Minister should immediately, and within 24 hours, determine if this is the Government's view, said Frederic Hauge.

Quote: Borten Moe is starting a race that has major foreign and geopolitical consequences. Now, countries around the pole as Russia, Canada, Denmark and the United States just push northward, and show that Norway is going to do it, see Frederic Hauge.

Further reading: The new Arctic war-zone

They say that there is up to 20% of Earths remaining resources in the Arctic which means there is only another 80% left somewhere and means that at some point in the not too distant future mankind with its ever increasing population will of consumed all of the Earths natural energy resources.

What happens then when we reach beyond the precipice we are now at?

Hopefully there are new technologies behind the scenes to compensate for there being no oil left to run our industrial Nations which would mean a complete break down in society with us entering a new dark age where we have to come to terms with a complete dead and broken unfunctioning society where it is back to basics with us or the next generation living in a completely different reality to the one we are living now.

It is not far off now, and will be in our children’s and grandchildren’s lifetime, the only peace we can have is that the Americas are now on Mars which shows how far we have come so there must be a transition from fossil fuels to another more advanced type of technology.

A new race for mankind rather than a nuclear arms race to destroy each other.

Norway is the standard bearer of this new Arctic conflict for oil & gas with ‘Operation Breivik’ being central to someones politics, the question remains though as to whose patsy was he?

Considering the Norwegian AUF-Labour Government are the ones who have closed the case down with the “solo terrorist” connected to no one label, meaning they do not want anyone else connected to his crimes because of the story it could tell, you have to question why? Which answers the above.

It does not take a rocket scientist...just a little research.

There could be some very big things coming in the not too distant future as all sides now line up for the political confrontation concerning the North Pole.

I Hope that a neutral Government who has all the evidence surrounding Breivik will use that trump card if it is in their National interests so that we can be shown the full truth behind the whole event with other people then held to account for their complicity and then let them decide whether or not to unravel some more truth.

A new reality based upon truth and not lies which is Democracy in action against a small group of the corrupt Elite who see a group of innocent young Norwegians as a price worth paying for their evil schemes.

Breivik was the willing pawn in their game of espionage, and possibly MI6's Gareth Williams a victim.

Further reading: Nuclear terrorism in London

28 August 2012

Rachel Corrie death - Her own fault

Further reading: My time with the ISM (The ISM unmasked)

Israelseen: Lee Kaplan on the ISM and Rachel Corrie

Website: Stop the ISM


Daily Mail

Israel court rules army was not at fault in 2003 death of US activist killed by bulldozer during Palestine protest

Today a judge in Haifa, Israel, said her death was an accident that she had brought on herself by entering a closed military zone at the height of the second intifada.

The Israeli army said the buildings were being used to attack Israeli soldiers and as covers for entrances to weapons smuggling tunnels beneath the border.

Reading from his 162-page verdict, the judge told the Haifa District Court that Corrie’s death was a 'regrettable accident' but could have been avoided if she had obeyed warning signs and a travel ban on the Gaza Strip issued by the US to its citizens.

Continue reading: Rachel Corrie death - Her own fault


27 August 2012

Funder behind Swedish suicide bomber jailed

Further reading: Questioning the 'lone wolf' scenario

Daily Record

Algerian who funded Stockholm suicide bombing jailed for seven years

NASSERDINE MENNI was found guilty of transferring money to Taimour Abdulwahab who then blew himself up in the Swedish capital in December 2010.

AN Algerian national found guilty of funding terrorism following a suicide bombing in Stockholm has been sentenced to seven years in prison.

Nasserdine Menni was convicted of transferring money to Taimour Abdulwahab, who later blew himself up in the Swedish capital on December 11 2010.

He sent a total of £5725 to a bank account in Abdulwahab's name in the knowledge that it could be used for terrorism purposes.

Continue reading: Funder of Swedish suicide bomber jailed

Further reading: French terrorist was not a 'lone wolf'

Norwegian Government minister has broken the law concerning July 22nd

VG

Quote:
(AP) When Rigmor Aasrud ​​requested an internal investigation in Government Administration Services, they may have broken the law by assigning a former commander to investigate his wife's work.

As the AP wrote Monday has the internal evaluation of crisis management 22 July has been conducted by the former chief of the Government Administration Services, Ivar Herø. son-Monitoring center Heroes are not only long-standing boss, but also have private relationships with Government Administration Services (DSS). The heros wife and son are employed by DSS, respectively, archive and monitoring centers in the government building. law were also at work when the terrorist bomb went off 22 last July.

Jan Fridtjof Bernt is Professor of Law at the University of Bergen and expert on conflicts of interest. He believes Hero is incompetent. - One who is responsible for the evaluation and investigation, must be quite impartial to those he is investigating. If any aspect of this report or investigation approaching the work or the work of the people he has a private relationship, then it will be a unique relationship and you will be disqualified.

Continue reading: Minister may have broken the law

It keeps getting worse for the current Norwegian State in control of the Breivik case who currently hold the reigns of power in Norway.

You have a police Director and Government minister caught lying to cover-up the truth and mislead people, and now a Government minister who has gone one step further and broken the law in the case.

This is just the tip of the iceberg and what is known so far, imagine what has gone on that is unknown in this case.

With regards to this new serious revelation it concerns a Government minister appointing someone to carry out a review of her department with regards to the events of July 22nd 2011 but it turns out that the wife and son of the person writing the report both work in her department.

A clear cut case of corruption with the clear intent of having a biased report to present to the Norwegian public wrapped up as an 'official' report.

It is not very hard to think the conclusion the report came to is it? Which is in sharp contrast to what the July 22nd Commission came to when they did an independent review of the same department.

Quote:
"DSS has handled the situation after the dramatic and catastrophic bomb explosion in a satisfactory manner, both in the acute phase and over time. All departments in the DSS from the moment of priority concern for the lives, health and security "

Krass criticism I 22 July Commission report (s 419-422) points out a number of weaknesses in the DSS 'emergency 22 July. ** There have been no large-scale exercise of the ministry staff with the car bomb or similar attacks against government officials that scenario. ** There were no guidelines, either orally or in writing, for how receptionists or security guards were acting in suspected car bomb. ** There was no notification procedures, procedures for evacuation or other measures should be taken against the employees.


Continue reading: The biased report

26 August 2012

Breivik: The English ‘mentor’ Reason & Motive

Updated below


If the truth was that Breivik had of been a paranoid schizophrenic ‘lone wolf’ who drove himself psychotic through reading right-wing websites and was inspired by my anti-jihad work on this blog then I could accept the accusation and rationale of being one of his inspirations and understood how I became entangled in the situation at the beginning, but that is not what happened contrary to media reports.

We now know the truth that “he was not” a paranoid schizophrenic who was psychotic before or after the time of his terrorist attacks contrary to the Norwegian State’s longstanding case against him which now lies in complete tatters before the World with very serious questions now surrounding it. They could have used the ‘insane’ label to cover-up the questionable lines of enquiry in the case if they had of secured the verdict they wanted, thus sweeping them under the carpet as the ramblings of a mad man. This cannot happen now and means Breivik was a fully functioning cognitive human being who knew exactly what he was doing and the reasons and motives for doing it.

Further reading: The Breivik judgement: "sane"

Breivik actually went one step further with me and attempted to have me arrested as his English ‘mentor’ the day after his planned suicide mission by placing subtle pointers in my direction and dressing up his planned terror group in the clothes of Templarism from which you can draw parallels from my blog which is completely different from being his inspiration. He even commented in police interview that he expected for someone to be arrested after the attacks which could only mean he was thinking about me because all fingers were pointed in my direction as the English ‘mentor’ in the outside World in the days after. He knew the potential results of his actions because it was part of his plan, so if the media thought I was the English ‘mentor’ then Breivik sitting in his prison cell knew beforehand what they were going to be thinking.

Why would Breivik want to have me arrested?

I do not know Breivik, have never met Breivik and knew nothing about him before July 22nd 2011, so what was his reason and motive behind attempting to have me arrested the day after his planned suicide mission?

Psychology is all about reason and motive because our actions are driven by reason and motive and we now know Breivik was a fully cognitive functioning human being so was thinking rationally and logically in the steps that he took in planning his terrorist attacks.

So what were his reasons and motives behind involving me?

Nobody has ‘officially’ explained this yet and the media still quote me as being a source of his inspiration.

There must be an explanation especially now we know he was not insane so it cannot just be dismissed, written off and swept under the carpet as the actions and ramblings of a mad man who was psychotic as the Norwegian Sate would have liked.

If I had of inspired Breivik through my blog then could he not have encouraged people to read my work through his manifesto like he did with his real ideological inspirations rather than attempting to have me arrested as the person who he actually met in 2002 who encouraged him go out and carry out his acts as part of a wider political agenda and terrorist campaign on-behalf of the group he says he belongs to?

I and my work are not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere and unlike other sources directly linked to the investigation Breivik himself has not mentioned anywhere that he was inspired by my work. Not that has been reported in the media anyway, it is only journalists themselves through the media who have stated I was his inspiration without knowing the facts in the case. The only thing I have seen him say about me in themedia is that I am an ideologue and that was after he was read my writings during his time in prison and commented on one of my statements.

The Norwegian writer Fraudman was his main ideological inspiration but did you see anything from Breivik that could have resulted in him being arrested, except on his own part for hiding his computer from the police which is suspicious in itself and passing very questionable statements under the circumstances to an Aftenposten journalist. Also there is no one else in the manifesto that had the potential to be arrested either, it was only me or the real English ‘mentor’ and I took the blame as being the English 'mentor'.

That was a hostile act against me, a direct attack from Breivik to have me arrested as an accomplice.

I like to think I am a fully functioning cognitive human being too, so when I stood accused of being the English ‘mentor’ I had to take a step back and look to see and understand what was going on with the little evidence that was provided at that point.

My first question; why would Breivik want to have me arrested when I do not even know him?

What could be his reason and motive?

He was promoting the likes of Fraudman, Pamella Geller, and the English Defence League as his inspirations that other likeminded individuals to himself should follow who I was openly vehemently against, and on the other hand attempting to have me arrested.

For me it was not hard to see that this ideological strain of the Counter-jihad movement that I was against had something to do with it.

Promoting my enemies in his life’s work, the “2083” manifesto for which he sacrificed his life for, and in the process committed what can only be described as a crime against humanity to promote it to the World, and attempting to have me arrested at the same time which could have turned out very differently for me if the grace of God was not upon me.

It is not hard to see is it?

Then I think to myself; who amongst that strain had real reason and motive and could fit the profile of being directly connected to Breivik.

The only person was Alan Lake the director behind the hijacked EDL and key player in the U.S/European Counter-jihad movement linking the EDL.

Further reading: EDL & Street politics

He and his close associates had allot to lose, which was their control over their “European political project” using the useful idiots of the English Defence League (what is left of them) if he was taken out of the picture and that was a very real scenario they were facing.

Reason and Motive.

So Breivik commits the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century, promoting the Counter-jihad movement and people from within it that I was openly against, and at the same time attempts to have me arrested which could have seen me locked up in prison for many years if he was dead and I was the only one left to take all the blame in the days after.

What do you think?

You probably do not know the facts, but anyone who has studied the rise of the English Defence League or who comes from within the movement and knew about the inner politics of the English Defence League will know.

The English Defence League came from somewhere and as an organisation has its leaders at the front and behind the scenes like Alan Lake, along with the story behind it and people’s involvement with it, even if the leaders lie to cover up the truth across their online media platform. Presenting a false reality which those who have had anything to do with the movement over the past few years know is the truth and I could give you as many witnesses as you want to support that statement.

Alan Lake is the key point man behind the movement (I could go into allot more incriminating evidence here but I will save it for next time) linking the financial political ideological side of the Counter-jihad movement to the English Defence League.

Remove him and there is a missing link in their “European political project”.

He was going to be removed and it was only a matter of time.

He knew it, and had allot to lose, especially if he was connected to others in the intelligence services foreign or domestic, and I go with foreign for now but do not rule anything out considering the protection he has had up until this point which means they were working with him on a bigger project that I was a direct threat to.

He is also known to be a part of a group of European intellectuals with a political agenda, along with access to finances to further that agenda.

That agenda has just seen this Counter-jihad clique surrounding Alan Lake in the European parliament so do not dismiss anything I am saying.

He was also an employee within the EU controlled European Bank for Reconstruction & Development before he was sacked a couple of weeks ago, and has contacts in the British Government, Swedish Government and Norwegian Government.

Who is he, where does he come from and how has he been able to work his way into the position he has been in?

He had allot to lose and I and others at that point were a direct threat to him and his position.

Again, reason and motive.

How else was I written into ‘Operation Breivik’ other than by Lake as an attempt to have me removed from being a direct threat or at the very least completely discredited by always being directly associated with being Anders Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ the man behind the monster which deflects all blame and attention from anyone else because I knew nothing about Breivik before July 22nd 2011.

This means he is directly connected to Breivik and his terrorist attacks, and is in-line with his twisted rhetoric at the beginning when he said: “the chickens coming home to roost”. Yes Breivik did come home to roost after being sent out from Norway after being recruited there in 2002 and travelling the World as part of his training process but who sent him home “to roost” is the question, with that statement a potential ominous sign.

How this part adds into the equation I do not know yet but Lake is directly connected to someone who uses the alias ‘Richard the Lionheart’ online who was important enough for Lake to have been invited to the pre-founding EDL strategy and discussion meeting in his London Barbican flat before the EDL founding meeting which is where I was first introduced to Lake and there are 2 other independent witnesses who can verify this person’s identity along with an email.

Breivik claims that his English ‘mentor’ was called 'Richard the Lionhearted' and one of the people who founded the English Defence League and that he sent him ideological material at its start.

Breivik was 10 years in the planning and whoever was behind him had the future plan of a terrorist attack inside Norway and attempted future terrorist group and campaign already in their mind and was working towards that goal and recruiting others along the way and had their eye on the Counter-jihad anti-jihad ‘scene’.

This is all in-line with Lake’s ideology and political activism, especially now knowing via my ex-military sources that he is actively recruiting ex-British military personnel to join his political cause.

How hard would it be for Breivik to stick to the truth about his English ‘mentor’ but just wrap that truth up in other clothes and place a few subtle pointers in there so as to deflect attention and apportion blame upon someone else which is exactly what he did?

At the founding English Defence League meeting there was a military strategist professor present which has already been confirmed by the chief investigative journalist at the Sunday Times.

Coincidentally Breivik’s final countdown phase towards his terrorist attacks where he started his acquisition of weapons and related materials coincided with the start of the English Defence League too.

Coincidence?

Breivik has also stated in police interview which was reported by the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet that Lakes 4 Freedoms Community website was a source of his ideological inspiration and was the same thinking behind his supposed Knights Templar group.

There you have a known direct link connecting the 2 from Breivik himself that has been reported by the Norwegian media, that you do not have with me and this blog in any media reports anywhere.

Although Breivik an avid commentator on web forums that he respected even leaving a comment on the EDL forum leading up to his attacks, he did not leave an electronic footprint on Lake’s 4 Freedoms site even though it was a source of his inspiration and there was a Norwegian room on the website.

What was his reason and motive for not wanting to leave an electronic footprint on Lake’s website?

Not very hard to think is it.

All links point to Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake being Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ only no serious action has been taken against him or anyone else connected to him yet to determine whether or not he or they are directly connected to Breivik and the July 22nd 2011 attacks, only a mickey mouse interview by British detectives as part of protocol in the case, although that could be very incriminating against him in the future.

Considering the Norwegian police are said to still be trying to trace the English ‘mentor’ ‘Richard the Lionhearted’ which is 1 of 3 people (2 women) they have not been able to trace out of 55 people within the manifesto they have already traced you would think that ascertaining the identity of Lakes close trusted associate who was invited to that first meeting in Lakes flat would be a priority in the case to see how that could possibly link into the whole case of which Lake has already been interviewed over his possible role as the English ‘mentor’.

The Norwegian State have failed in their obligation in the Breivik case at every turn, with their response to the attacks as shown in the July 22nd Commission report, and their prosecution case in the court room in front of the Worlds media. The only thing left is to investigate the credibility of their ‘official’ police investigation that concluded Breivik was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one which means there is no one else to look for which on the face of it means Lake is not directly connected to Breivik because as far as the Norwegian State in control of the investigation is concerned Breivik is not connected to anyone else.

They have closed the case down from the top.

Based on the known evidence there can be no trust placed in that ‘official’ conclusion which means there are others directly connected to Breivik who at this moment in time have escaped their complicity in the terrorist attacks in Norway.

Why would the Norwegian State close the case down and cover-up the truth and allow others to escape their complicity in the event?

Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake has a contact in the Norwegian Government.

He also had a Norwegian secretary in one of his money funnelling companies which is 2 direct links into Norway prior to July 22nd 2011 on top of the direct links to Breivik himself.

There has to be an ‘official’ explanation as to how I ended up accused of being the English ‘mentor’, not least because Christian Halto stated that Breivik mentioned me himself which I cannot see anywhere (unless in police interview) other than the subtle pointers placed within the manifesto to apportion blame and suspicion in my direction.

That is not mentioning me himself, that is knowing people would point the finger and apportion blame upon me because of subtle pointers he placed inside the manifesto that even the police construed was me which is completely different and wrong and a slanderous statement that was used to smear my name all over the World news as the English ‘mentor’.

If those subtle pointers were placed inside the manifesto to apportion blame and suspicion then the question that has to be answered is; why?

What was Breivik’s reason and motive for doing that considering I do not know him?

This is my explanation behind the reason and motive based upon factual evidence which means that there are others directly connected to him and his terrorist attacks contrary to the Norwegian State’s ‘official’ conclusion of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one. The insane label has now been dismissed which leaves a level headed terrorist who knew his actions and the results of those actions, so questions like this cannot just be dismissed and swept under the carpet now.

Especially not because the Norwegian police have an official witness statement stating all of this which was been ruled out because of their State sanctioned ‘official’ conclusion claiming Breivik was/is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one.

All that is left is to now test the integrity of the Norwegian police investigation and if found that multiple lines of enquiry have been refused to be followed up on then you have the 3rd aspect of this State controlled case that has failed the Norwegian people.

This will then tell its own story or confirm a story and we already know in this case that Norwegian State ‘officials’ have been caught lying to mislead the public and opposition parties in that Country to cover-up the truth.

............................................

A thought came to me when thinking over this whole scenario surrounding my implication in the case at the very beginning where I was lined up as being the English 'mentor' behind Breivik as covered above.

The first set of psychiatrists who evaluated Breivik put his talk of Knights Templar down to delusions, they did not mention anywhere that Breivik could have taken anything from me and this blog and incorporated it into his thinking and then explained his reasons for doing that, they just dismissed it as delusions with no basis in reality.

The second set of psychiatrists put Breivik's talk of Knights Templar down to being a figment of his imagination, again not mentioning anywhere anything about me or this blog as an explanation behind his thinking and the reasons why and where it came from: Explaining context

The Norwegian police in court did not mention anywhere about Breivik taking anything from me and this blog either even though Christian Halto stated Breivik mentioned me himself, they just dismissed the Knights Templar as non-existence without explaining anything about me, this blog, and Breivik's claim of 'Richard the Lionhearted' etc etc etc and where this came from and why.

All 3 sets of professionals excluded in court the possibility to my knowledge that Breivik copied anything from me and this blog.

If that is the case then why was it a general consensus in the international media in the days after the terrorist attacks that Breivik copied me and this blog which made me out to be the English 'mentor' behind him who had inspired him?

Richard the Lionheart, Knights Templar, anti-moslem and a few other things does not sound like delusions or a figment of his imagination to me sitting here.

Seems very rationale and logical to me.

Every journalist who wrote an article claiming I was Breivik's English 'mentor' must be thinking that same thing if they are reading this now and be wondering what the explanation behind how I stood accused is.

Remember he is not a paranoid schizophrenic who was psychotic either so everything he did was rational within the framework of his terrorist attacks so can be explained logically on that basis and means that everything he did had meaning and purpose behind it.


Does it not beg the question as to why the psychiatrists and police did not explain Breivik's Knights Templar idea in the context of me and this blog by saying he copied me and then given the reasons why he did this?

Why has no explanation been given even though Breivik crafted it so perfectly to apportion blame in my direction the days after the attacks, expecting me to be arrested?

They just completely ignored me and this blog as if it played no part in anything within the context of the case.


If they had of mentioned me and this blog it would have opened up a whole different angle on the case that needed explaining and brought my 'official' evidence into play, and they obviously had not fully investigated my 'official' evidence to see whether or not it held up, they just dismissed it.

They completely excluded my explanation behind why I believed Breivik had set me up for arrest which explains the Knights Templar, Richard the Lionhearted and other pointers placed inside the manifesto directing attention my way and enlightened this aspect of the case. Why do you think I traveled to Norway at the height of blame upon my shoulders?


They just dismissed the Knights Templar as delusions and a figment of his imagination as if part of his 'madness' or lies without explaining where it came from and why even though it was a general consensus in the media that it was me, even though it was not me but a part of Breivik's plan that needs explaining.

I did hear my name mentioned by several reporters during the few snippets of the trial I saw when they posed questions after the days proceedings but cannot remember what was said.

To my knowledge nobody anywhere in the trial said that Breivik copied anything from me and this blog.

So why did I stand accused of being his English 'mentor' in the international media based upon Christian Halto's 'official' Norwegian police statement to the media, along with Breivik's pointers in my direction?

Does this angle on the case not warrant explaining, because if I am right it explains why Breivik attempted to set me up for arrest and means other peoples direct involvement with him.

Or is it another case of the Norwegian State closing the case down because they do not want the real truth to emerge for some reason so they just completely ignore this angle on the case as if it does not even exist?

I would like to know the full truth behind why I stood accused in the Worlds media of being Breivik's English 'mentor'.

I have come to my own conclusion and there is still outstanding evidence in the case that the Norwegian police have not investigated because the case has been shut down from the very top with the "solo terrorist"connected to no one 'official' conclusion which means as far as they are concerned there is nobody else to look for.

Is that the path of truth & justice Norwegian style?

What if Breivik is directly connected to others, should they not be held accountable for their complicity in the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century that can only be described as a crime against humanity?

What does the memory of all those dead young Norwegian people think about that?

25 August 2012

Breivik's lawyer now working on UK extradition case


VG: Geir Lippestad working on UK extradition case

What are the chances of that in the scheme of things considering there is now the very real possibility that there are UK citizens who are directly connected to Anders Breivik and his July 22nd 2011 massacre and bombing, or who hold vital key information directly connected to the case and other peoples possible direct involvement. This would mean the potential for multiple extradition cases from the UK to Norway for them to undergo police interview under caution, if they were not willing to travel voluntarily that is, with them then standing trial in the Country if there is evidence against them and they are charged with conspiracy to commit terrorist acts.


Atleast Geir Lippestad will now know the intricate details of extradition law between the 2 Countries and even though he is a defence lawyer he knows what is right and what is wrong in this case that has affected his whole Country as he has played a central role as Breivik's lawyer from the beginning so knows whether or not their is scope for people to be interviewed under police caution.

If nobody has anything to hide then voluntarily offering up a witness statement in such a serious case that they are directly implicated in should be a matter or course, but to attempt to refuse and then go down the path of fighting extradition would tell its own story.

And we already know that individuals are already partial to using lawyers to lie on their behalf over this case so extradition might be the only option.

Will be interesting to see now considering there is still outstanding evidence in the Breivik case that this Counter-jihad clique along with others still posses.

Further reading: The eye of the storm - The investigation

Who is going to investigate the Breivik investigation?

There has been an investigation into the Civil State Security Apparatus's response to 'Operation Breivik' before and during the terrorist attacks which found a catastrophic number of errors led to the terrorist attacks not only being able to have been prevented before July 22nd 2011 but also not being as bad during the time of the event.

The Commission report that covered the investigation into the Emergency response to 'Operation Breivik' also highlighted a State appointed police Director lying when giving testimony to the media and political opposition along with a Government official (that we know of), and the Prime Minister refusing to secure the Government building when repeatedly being told to do so which means negligence in political office.

Misleading the public and political opposition concerning the truth surrounding 'Operation Breivik' which is an attempted cover-up and white-wash of the truth and facts in the case on State level.

We have now seen the State's prosecution case against Breivik played out in front of the World's media that has shown it to be a pre-planned concerted effort from the very top to influence the 'rule of law' towards their predetermined goal in the case.

To secure the 'criminally insane' label upon Breivik.

This is contrary to the belief of 9 out of 10 Norwegians following the trial, the psychiatric field in Norway and abroad, and the presiding judges who unanimously rejected the prosecutions case and heavily criticised all aspects of it in summing up.

What does that tell you about the State's prosecution case?

The only thing left now is to investigate the Norwegian police investigation into 'Operation Breivik' to determine whether or not their 'official' conclusion that Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one is actually a credible and fail-safe conclusion that can be trusted.

Based upon the Norwegian State's 'official' case so far and its complete and utter failings it is not very hard to perceive the outcome.

If there are others directly connected to Anders Breivik and his actions on July 22nd 2011 then should they too not be held to account for their complicity in his crimes?

Most importantly the mass murder and massacre of a group of innocent misguided teenagers on their summer camp in the name of politics.

We have to wait now to see whether or not the integrity and credibility of the 'official' Norwegian police investigation is going to be investigated to determine whether or not it is credible, and considering all aspects of this case must be anaylsed for the sake of Norwegian society to understand fully what happened on July 22nd 2011 then it is very hard to see how investigating the police investigation cannot now take place.

Or is the Norwegian police investigation into 'Operation Breivik' beyond reproach?